BACKGROUND & AIMS:
OBJECTIVE:Diagnosis of neonatal catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is currently based on isolation of identical bacterial species from bloodstream and catheter tip cultures. This requires removal of the catheter followed by the insertion of a new catheter. The objective of this study was to investigate whether differential time to positivity (DTP) of blood cultures drawn from paired peripheral vein and central vascular catheter is useful for diagnosing neonatal CRBSI, avoiding removal of the catheter.
DESIGN:Retrospective observational study.
SETTING:Neonatal intensive care unit, University Hospital of Antwerp, Belgium.
PATIENTS:Neonates with probable and definite nosocomial bloodstream infection.
INTERVENTIONS:All episodes of nosocomial bloodstream infection (NBSI) in an approximately 7.5-yr period were identified retrospectively. Definite NBSI episodes in which paired blood cultures were obtained were retained to calculate DTP, to determine the optimal DTP cutoff for the diagnosis of CRBSI, and to assess the validity of DTP for the diagnosis of CRBSI.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Of 32 NBSI episodes included in the study, 16 were CRBSI, seven were non-CRBSI, and nine were classified as "diagnosis uncertain." In CRBSI, blood cultures drawn from a central vascular catheter were positive earlier than those drawn from a peripheral vein (median 9.67 hrs vs. 21.58 hrs, p < .01). Median DTP was 10.42 hrs in CRBSI and -0.33 hrs in non-CRBSI (p = .01). The optimal DTP cutoff for the diagnosis of CRBSI was > or =1 hr (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.84 +/- 0.11), with a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 71%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of 83%.
CONCLUSIONS:Differential time to positivity of paired blood cultures may have some potential in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients and should be subjected to a prospective study.
背景与目标:
目的:诊断新生儿导管相关的血流感染(CRBSI)目前是基于从血流和导管尖端培养物中分离出相同的细菌。这需要移除导管,然后插入新导管。这项研究的目的是调查从成对的外周静脉和中央血管导管抽取的血液培养物的阳性反应时间(DTP)是否可用于诊断新生儿CRBSI,避免移除导管。
设计:回顾性观察研究。
地点:比利时安特卫普大学医院新生儿重症监护室。
患者:新生儿可能伴有明确的医院血流感染。
干预措施:回顾性分析了大约7.5年期间的所有医院血流感染(NBSI)事件。保留获得配对血液培养物的明确NBSI事件,以计算DTP,确定诊断CRBSI的最佳DTP截止值,并评估DTP诊断CRBSI的有效性。
测量和主要结果:在研究中包括的32例NBSI发作中,CRBSI为16例,非CRBSI为7例,其中9例被归类为“诊断不确定”。在CRBSI中,从中央血管导管抽取的血液培养物比从外周静脉抽取的血液培养物更早呈阳性(中位9.67小时vs. 21.58小时,p <0.01)。在CRBSI中,DTP的中位数为10.42小时,在非CRBSI中,DTP的中位数为-0.33小时(p = .01)。诊断CRBSI的最佳DTP截止时间>或= 1 hr(接收器工作特征曲线下的面积= 0.84 /-0.11),灵敏度为94%,特异性为71%,阳性预测值为88% ,并且阴性预测值为83%。
结论:成对血液培养阳性时间的差异可能在新生儿重症监护病房患者的导管相关感染的诊断中具有一定的潜力,应进行前瞻性研究。