BACKGROUND:There is no doubt that mental health care should be geared toward evidence, cost-effectiveness, and need. Health care data that allow comparisons of demand and real needs are scarce. This is especially true for outpatient care. METHOD:The aim of this study was to assess and analyze data from health insurance plans and social welfare. RESULTS:The costs of mental health care in Germany amount to 13 mio per year and 100,000 population. Health insurance schemes account for two thirds of total costs and social welfare for one third. The distribution of expenses seems not to be based on need analyses. Especially the chronically mentally ill are disadvantaged. CONCLUSIONS:The redistribution of expenses from inpatient to outpatient care including integrated health care approaches would result in more cost-effective mental health care.

译文

背景:毫无疑问,精神卫生保健应针对证据,成本效益和需求。可以比较需求和实际需求的医疗保健数据很少。对于门诊护理尤其如此。
方法:本研究的目的是评估和分析来自健康保险计划和社会福利的数据。
结果:德国的精神保健费用每年达13 mio ,并有100,000人口。健康保险计划占总费用的三分之二,社会福利占三分之一。支出的分配似乎不是基于需求分析的。特别是长期患有精神疾病的人处于不利地位。
结论:从住院到门诊的费用再分配,包括综合医疗方法,将导致更具成本效益的精神医疗。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录