OBJECTIVE:Surgeon-controlled endoscope leading assistance systems are a novelty in endoscopic surgery. These systems were evaluated for their applicability and reliability in operative gynecology. In this regard, we evaluated possible methods of operation, operative time, setup time, and comfort for the surgeon, complications, blood transfusions, length of stay, hemoglobin levels, and demographic data. METHODS:Two systems with technically identical camera control systems were applied, the SOLOASSISTTM system and the Einstein VisionTM 3D system. The arm systems are attached to the operating table and controlled by surgeon via a manual control, a remote control or a foot switch. Comfort for the surgeon was evaluated using a questionnaire (scale 1-5; 1 "very good", 5 "poor"). All data were collected prospectively in a database (IBM SPSS Statistics 20) and evaluated. RESULTS:One hundred and four patients underwent surgery supported by an active control system. In 43 (41 %) cases, oncological interventions were performed. Average setup time was 7 (3-30) min. There was a significant learning curve regarding the mounting of the system after 20 operations (p = 0.045). Overall comfort was rated as "good", divided into control 2.2 (2-4), physical effort 2.1 (1-4), picture quality 1.6 (1-3), and overall satisfaction 2.1 (1-4). About 75 unwanted camera movements were noticed in 104 surgeries. Complications occurred in no case (0 %). CONCLUSION:The application of an active camera control system was evaluated to be safe for all gynecological laparoscopies. Picture blur is avoided even during prolonged complex procedures. Moreover, the assistant is able to support the surgeon with two instruments, with the result that the presence of a second assistant is not required for complex interventions. Causing only minimal setup time, the examined active control systems improve the effectiveness of surgeries. The physical effort required for the assistant decreases and, by reducing tiring operations and tremor, subsequently, higher precision is reached.

译文

目的:外科医生控制的内窥镜前导辅助系统在内窥镜手术中是一种新颖的技术。对这些系统在妇科手术中的适用性和可靠性进行了评估。在这方面,我们评估了可能的手术方法,手术时间,准备时间和外科医生的舒适度,并发症,输血,住院时间,血红蛋白水平和人口统计学数据。
方法:使用了两个技术上相同的相机控制系统的系统,即SOLOASSISTTM系统和Einstein VisionTM 3D系统。手臂系统安装在手术台上,并由外科医生通过手动控制,远程控制或脚踏开关进行控制。使用问卷调查表评估外科医生的舒适度(1-5分; 1分“非常好”,5分“差”)。所有数据均前瞻性地收集在数据库中(IBM SPSS Statistics 20)并进行了评估。
结果:104例患者接受了主动控制系统支持的手术。在43例(41%)病例中,进行了肿瘤干预。平均设置时间为7(3-30)分钟。在20次操作后,有关系统安装的学习曲线非常显着(p = 0.045)。总体舒适度被评为“良好”,分为对照组2.2(2-4),体力2.1(1-4),图像质量1.6(1-3)和总体满意度2.1(1-4)。在104个手术中,发现约75次不必要的摄像机移动。没有发生并发症(0%)。
结论:对所有妇科腹腔镜检查应用主动相机控制系统的安全性进行了评估。即使在长时间的复杂过程中也可以避免图像模糊。而且,该助手能够用两种仪器来支持外科医生,结果是复杂的干预不需要第二助手的存在。经过检查的主动控制系统仅造成最短的设置时间,从而提高了手术的效率。助手所需的体力减少,并且通过减少疲劳操作和震颤,随后达到了更高的精度。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录