CONTEXT:Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis involves balancing a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) against a higher risk of bleeding, a trade-off that critically depends on the risks of VTE and bleeding in the absence of prophylaxis (baseline risk). OBJECTIVE:To provide estimates of the baseline risk of symptomatic VTE and bleeding requiring reoperation in urological cancer surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION:We identified contemporary observational studies reporting symptomatic VTE or bleeding after urological procedures. We used studies with the lowest risk of bias and accounted for use of thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up to derive best estimates of the baseline risks within 4 wk of surgery. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS:We included 71 studies reporting on 14 urological cancer procedures. The quality of the evidence was generally moderate for prostatectomy and cystectomy, and low or very low for other procedures. The duration of thromboprophylaxis was highly variable. The risk of VTE in cystectomies was high (2.6-11.6% across risk groups) whereas the risk of bleeding was low (0.3%). The risk of VTE in prostatectomies varied by procedure, from 0.2-0.9% in robotic prostatectomy without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to 3.9-15.7% in open prostatectomy with extended PLND. The risk of bleeding was 0.1-1.0%. The risk of VTE following renal procedures was 0.7-2.9% for low-risk patients and 2.6-11.6% for high-risk patients; the risk of bleeding was 0.1-2.0%. CONCLUSIONS:Extended thromboprophylaxis is warranted in some procedures (eg, open and robotic cystectomy) but not others (eg, robotic prostatectomy without PLND in low-risk patients). For "close call" procedures, decisions will depend on values and preferences with regard to VTE and bleeding. PATIENT SUMMARY:Clinicians often give blood thinners to patients to prevent blood clots after surgery for urological cancer. Unfortunately, blood thinners also increase bleeding. This study provides information on the risk of clots and bleeding that is crucial in deciding for or against giving blood thinners.

译文

背景:药理学上的血栓预防包括在较低的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险与较高的出血风险之间进行权衡,这一权衡主要取决于在不进行预防的情况下VTE和出血的风险(基准风险)。
目的:提供对泌尿外科癌症手术中有症状的VTE和出血需要重新手术的基线风险的估计。
证据获取:我们确定了当代观察性研究,报告了有症状的VTE或泌尿外科手术后出血。我们使用偏倚风险最低的研究,并考虑了血栓预防措施的使用和随访时间,以得出手术4周内基线风险的最佳估计值。我们使用GRADE方法评估证据的质量。
证据综合:我们纳入了71项研究,报告了14种泌尿系统癌症的程序。前列腺切除术和膀胱切除术的证据质量一般中等,其他手术的证据质量很低或非常低。血栓预防的时间长短不一。膀胱切除术中VTE的风险较高(各风险组之间为2.6-11.6%),而出血的风险较低(0.3%)。前列腺切除术中VTE的风险因手术而异,从不进行盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)的机器人前列腺切除术中的0.2-0.9%到延长PLND的开放式前列腺切除术中的3.9-15.7%。出血的风险为0.1-1.0%。低危患者肾手术后发生VTE的风险为0.7-2.9%,高危患者为2.6-11.6%;出血风险为0.1-2.0%。
结论:某些手术(例如开放式和机器人膀胱切除术)需要延长血栓预防措施,但其他手术(例如低危患者中不使用PLND的机器人前列腺切除术)则应予以延长。对于“近距离呼叫”程序,决策将取决于关于VTE和出血的值和偏好。
病人总结:临床医生经常给患者使用血液稀释剂,以防止泌尿外科手术后的血液凝块。不幸的是,血液稀释剂也会增加出血。这项研究提供了有关血凝块和出血风险的信息,这对于决定是否使用稀释剂至关重要。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录