The active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge© provides a variety of coupling modalities of the floating mass transducer (FMT) to various structures of the ossicular chain and the round window. A retrospective analysis was performed on 125 subjects (n = 137 ears) (1) to compare the efficacy of the different FMT coupling modalities with increasing degree of hearing loss, (2) to compare the performance in speech outcome and the effective gain between the coupling types, and (3) to evaluate the risk of additional hearing loss of each coupling procedure. The patients were grouped according to their type of FMT coupling into incus vibroplasty (incus group, n = 59), round window vibroplasty with coupler (RWC group, n = 23), round window vibroplasty without coupler (RW group, n = 22), and oval window vibroplasty with coupler (OWC group, n = 33). For each coupling group, pre- and postoperative thresholds, the results of the Freiburg monosyllable test at 65 dB SPL, and the effective gain across frequencies (0.5-6 kHz) were evaluated. A logistic regression function was used to describe the relationship between word recognition scores (WRS, in % correct) and the mean bone conduction (BC) hearing loss. The surgical procedure had no clinically relevant effect on BC thresholds of patients in each coupling group. The BC pure tone average (PTA4) for 50% WRS predicted by the model function was similar for the incus (48.2 dB nHL), RW (47.8 dB nHL), and OWC (49.0 dB nHL) groups, but higher for the RWC group (67.9 dB nHL). However, the median WRS was 80% or better with no significant differences in speech perception between coupling types (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.229). The effective gain shows an advantage for the incus coupling between 0.5 and 2 kHz over the other coupling types. The performance of the FMT coupling modalities is equally good for patients with a mild-to-moderate hearing loss, but the efficacy of coupling types differs for patients with greater hearing loss (>48 dB BC HL).

译文

:有源中耳植入物Vibrant Soundbridge©为听骨链和圆窗的各种结构提供了多种浮动质量传感器(FMT)的耦合方式。对125位受试者(n = 137耳)进行了回顾性分析(1),以比较不同FMT耦合方式的效果与听力损失程度的增加;(2)比较语言结局的表现和两者之间的有效增益。耦合类型,以及(3)评估每个耦合过程额外听力损失的风险。根据患者的FMT耦合类型将其分为in骨成形术(in骨组,n = 59),带耦合器的圆窗玻璃成形术(RWC组,n = 23),不带钩子的圆窗玻璃成形术(RW组,n = 22)。 ,以及使用耦合器的椭圆形窗口玻璃体成形术(OWC组,n = 33)。对于每个耦合组,评估术前和术后阈值,65 dB SPL的弗莱堡单音节测试结果以及整个频率(0.5-6 kHz)的有效增益。使用逻辑回归函数来描述单词识别分数(WRS,正确率%)与平均骨传导(BC)听力损失之间的关系。手术方法对每个偶联组患者的BC阈值均无临床相关影响。通过模型函数预测的50%WRS的BC纯音平均值(PTA4)在砧骨(48.2 dB nHL),RW(47.8 dB nHL)和OWC(49.0 dB nHL)组中相似,但在RWC组中更高(67.9 dB nHL)。但是,中位WRS为80%或更高,在耦合类型之间的语音感知上没有显着差异(Kruskal-Wallis检验,p = 0.229)。与其他耦合类型相比,有效增益在0.5和2 kHz之间的Incus耦合方面显示出优势。对于轻度至中度听力损失的患者,FMT耦合方式的性能同样好,但是对于听力损失较大(> 48 dB BC HL)的患者,耦合类型的功效有所不同。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录