The validity of a short questionnaire on fertility problems was tested on a group of 151 moderately educated women who had participated in a prospective study on early pregnancy failure some years before. Part of this group was approached by a personal interview, another part by telephone interviews and a third part was sent a questionnaire by mail. Reliability was tested on another population of 89 women with at least one child. The questionnaire was presented to these women twice with an interval of 3-5 weeks. The validity study showed no systematic errors for either of the approaches. Random errors were fairly large except for the personal interviews. The reliability showed great stability for the telephone interviews as well as for the mailed questionnaire. It is concluded that the questionnaire performs reasonably well, but on some items the draft questionnaire should be rephrased. The choice of a specific approach to the study population depends on the research question.

译文

:对一组151名受过中等教育的妇女进行了关于生育问题的简短问卷调查的有效性,这些妇女在几年前参加了有关早期妊娠失败的前瞻性研究。该小组中的一部分通过个人面谈与另一部分进行了电话采访,另一部分通过邮件发送了调查表。在另外89位有至少一个孩子的妇女中测试了可靠性。问卷以3-5周的间隔两次向这些女性展示。有效性研究表明,这两种方法均无系统性错误。除了个人访谈外,随机误差相当大。可靠性显示了电话采访和邮寄问卷的高度稳定性。结论是,调查表的表现还算不错,但在某些项目上,调查表草案应重新措辞。针对研究人群的特定方法的选择取决于研究问题。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录