The study aimed to 1) examine the point prevalence of asynchronous breathing in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) patients; 2) examine whether CFS patients with an asynchronous breathing pattern present with diminished lung function in comparison with CFS patients with a synchronous breathing pattern; and 3) examine whether one session of breathing retraining in CFS patients with an asynchronous breathing pattern is able to improve lung function. Twenty patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for CFS were recruited for participation in a pilot controlled clinical trial with repeated measures. Patients presenting with an asynchronous breathing pattern were given 20-30 minutes of breathing retraining. Patients presenting with a synchronous breathing pattern entered the control group and received no intervention. Of the 20 enrolled patients with CFS, 15 presented with a synchronous breathing pattern and the remaining 5 patients (25%) with an asynchronous breathing pattern. Baseline comparison revealed no group differences in demographic features, symptom severity, respiratory muscle strength, or pulmonary function testing data (spirometry). In comparison to no treatment, the session of breathing retraining resulted in an acute (immediately postintervention) decrease in respiratory rate (p < 0.001) and an increase in tidal volume (p < 0.001). No other respiratory variables responded to the session of breathing retraining. In conclusion, the present study provides preliminary evidence supportive of an asynchronous breathing pattern in a subgroup of CFS patients, and breathing retraining might be useful for improving tidal volume and respiratory rate in CFS patients presenting with an asynchronous breathing motion.

译文

:这项研究旨在1)检查慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)患者异步呼吸的点流行率; 2)检查具有异步呼吸模式的CFS患者与具有同步呼吸模式的CFS患者相比,其肺功能是否降低;和3)检查具有异步呼吸模式的CFS患者进行一次呼吸再训练是否能够改善肺功能。招募了20名符合CFS诊断标准的患者参加了一项具有重复措施的中试对照临床试验。对表现出异步呼吸模式的患者进行20-30分钟的呼吸再训练。出现同步呼吸模式的患者进入对照组,未接受干预。在20名CFS入组患者中,有15名表现为同步呼吸模式,其余5名患者(25%)表现为异步呼吸模式。基线比较显示,在人口统计学特征,症状严重程度,呼吸肌力量或肺功能测试数据(肺活量测定)方面无群体差异。与不进行治疗相比,呼吸再训练的过程导致呼吸频率急性下降(干预后立即发生)(p <0.001),潮气量增加(p <0.001)。没有其他呼吸变量对呼吸训练进行响应。总之,本研究提供了支持CFS患者亚组中异步呼吸方式的初步证据,呼吸再训练对于改善具有异步呼吸运动的CFS患者的潮气量和呼吸频率可能是有用的。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录