AIMS:The aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. BACKGROUND:Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. DESIGN:The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. METHODS:The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. FINDINGS:Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. CONCLUSION:The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho-oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology.

译文

目的:本研究的目的是为提高元民族志报告的完整性和清晰度提供指导。
背景:基于证据的政策和实践需要可靠的证据综合,可以进一步了解人们的经历和相关的社会过程。元民族志学是由Noblit和Hare开发的严格的七阶段定性证据综合方法。元民族志学在健康研究中被广泛使用,但是报告的质量通常很差,这阻碍了人们对其研究结果的信任和使用。需要元民族志报告指南来提高报告质量。
设计:eMERGe研究使用严格的混合方法设计和基于证据的方法来开发新颖的报告指南和解释性注释。
方法:该研究于2015年至2017年进行,包括:(1)对元民族志学行为和报告指南的方法学系统回顾; (2)对已出版的元民族志进行审查和审核,以识别良好做法原则; (3)达成指导内容的国际,多学科共识建立过程; (4)创新发展的指导和解释性说明。
结果:新确定了元民族志行为和报告的所有七个阶段的建议和良好实践,从而形成了19个报告标准并随附了详细的指南。
结论:定制的《 eMERGe报告指南》结合了新的方法学发展和先进的方法,可以帮助研究人员报告元民族志的重要方面。使用指南应提高报告质量。更好的报告可以使对结果的信心评估更加有力,并可以更多地使用元民族志输出成果,以改善卫生和其他领域的实践,政策和服务使用者的成果。这是针对元民族志的第一个量身定制的报告指南。本文同时在以下期刊上发表:《高级护理杂志》,《心理肿瘤学》,《教育评论》和BMC医学研究方法论。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录