OBJECTIVE:To determine whether extended transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus improves long-term survival. BACKGROUND:A randomized trial was performed to compare surgical techniques. Complete 5-year survival data are now available. METHODS:A total of 220 patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (type I) or gastric cardia involving the distal esophagus (type II) were randomly assigned to limited transhiatal esophagectomy or to extended transthoracic esophagectomy with en bloc lymphadenectomy. Patients with peroperatively irresectable/incurable cancer were excluded from this analysis (n = 15). A total of 95 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy and 110 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. RESULTS:After transhiatal and transthoracic resection, 5-year survival was 34% and 36%, respectively (P = 0.71, per protocol analysis). In a subgroup analysis, based on the location of the primary tumor according to the resection specimen, no overall survival benefit for either surgical approach was seen in 115 patients with a type II tumor (P = 0.81). In 90 patients with a type I tumor, a survival benefit of 14% was seen with the transthoracic approach (51% vs. 37%, P = 0.33). There was evidence that the treatment effect differed depending on the number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen (test for interaction P = 0.06). In patients (n = 55) without positive nodes locoregional disease-free survival after transhiatal esophagectomy was comparable to that after transthoracic esophagectomy (86% and 89%, respectively). The same was true for patients (n = 46) with more than 8 positive nodes (0% in both groups). Patients (n = 104) with 1 to 8 positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen showed a 5-year locoregional disease-free survival advantage if operated via the transthoracic route (23% vs. 64%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION:There is no significant overall survival benefit for either approach. However, compared with limited transhiatal resection extended transthoracic esophagectomy for type I esophageal adenocarcinoma shows an ongoing trend towards better 5-year survival. Moreover, patients with a limited number of positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen seem to benefit from an extended transthoracic esophagectomy.

译文

目的:探讨扩大经胸食管切除术治疗中/远端食道腺癌是否能提高长期生存率。
背景:进行了一项随机试验以比较手术技术。现在可以获取完整的5年生存数据。
方法:将220例远端食管腺癌(I型)或累及远端食道(II型)的胃card门腺癌患者随机分配至经限制的经食管食管切除术或经整体淋巴结清扫的经胸经食道切除术。患有无法手术切除/无法治愈的癌症的患者被排除在本分析之外(n = 15)。共有95例行经食管食管切除术,110例行经胸食管切除术。
结果:经食管和胸腔切除后,5年生存率分别为34%和36%(根据方案分析,P = 0.71)。在亚组分析中,根据切除标本中原发肿瘤的位置,在115例II型肿瘤患者中,两种手术方法均未发现总体生存获益(P = 0.81)。在90例I型肿瘤患者中,经胸腔入路的生存获益为14%(51%对37%,P = 0.33)。有证据表明,根据切除标本中阳性淋巴结的数量,治疗效果会有所不同(相互作用测试P = 0.06)。在无阳性淋巴结转移的患者(n = 55)中,经食管食管切除术后的无局部区域生存率与经胸食管切除术后的无局部生存率相当(分别为86%和89%)。对于阳性淋巴结多于8个(两组均为0%)的患者(n = 46)也是如此。切除标本中有1至8个阳性淋巴结的患者(n = 104)通过经胸腔手术进行手术可显示5年无局部区域疾病生存优势(23%vs. 64%,P = 0.02)。
结论:这两种方法均没有显着的总体生存获益。然而,与有限的经食管切除相比,扩大的经胸食管切除术治疗I型食管腺癌显示出一种持续的向5年生存的趋势。此外,切除标本中淋巴结阳性的患者数量有限,似乎可以从扩大的经胸食管切除术中受益。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录