OBJECTIVES:Clinicians learn from prior adverse events through pharmacovigilance allowing for improved medication safety in the medication use process; therefore, adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting needs to be maximized. This systematic review was conducted to determine whether engaging patients/caregivers in ADR reporting during a patient's hospitalization provides further information about ADRs not obtained from traditional sources of reporting (i.e., voluntary reporting, medical record review). METHODS:This review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A literature search was conducted from January 2018 to June 2019 in PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase. Studies were included if they were (i) conducted in the inpatient setting, (ii) surveyed patients/caregivers, (iii) compared patient/caregiver reporting with another source of reporting, and (iv) evaluated ADRs. Studies completed in an outpatient setting or nursing home were excluded. RESULTS:A total of 11 studies were included. Sources of ADR information from patient/caregiver were obtained through interviews, surveys, questionnaires, or open-ended responses. Patient reporting was compared with medical record reports (7 articles) and health care professional reporting (4 articles). Approximately 11% to 35% of ADRs reported from patients were not identified through voluntary reporting by health care professionals, and 5.6% to 66% of ADRs obtained from patient reporting were not provided in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS:Patients/caregivers are important sources of safety information to improve system and practice of medication use that may not be recorded by other surveillance methods. Administrators and clinicians need to determine the best approach to integrate patients/caregivers into routine reporting for optimal engagement.

译文

目的:临床医生可以通过药物警戒从先前的不良事件中学习,从而可以在用药过程中提高用药的安全性;因此,药物不良反应(ADR)报告需要最大化。进行了系统的审查,以确定在患者住院期间让患者/护理人员参与ADR报告是否提供了有关从传统报告来源(即自愿报告,病历审查)中未获得的有关ADR的更多信息。
方法:根据系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南进行本评价。从2018年1月至2019年6月在PubMed,CINAHL和Embase进行了文献检索。包括以下各项的研究:(i)在住院环境中进行的;(ii)受调查的患者/护理人员;(iii)将患者/护理人员的报告与其他报告来源进行比较;以及(iv)评估了ADR。在门诊或疗养院完成的研究被排除在外。
结果:共纳入11项研究。来自患者/护理人员的ADR信息来源是通过访谈,调查,问卷或不限成员名额的答复获得的。将患者报告与病历报告(7篇文章)和卫生保健专业报告(4篇文章)进行了比较。医护人员未通过自愿报告确定约有11%至35%的患者报告的ADR,病历中未提供从患者报告中获得的ADR的5.6%至66%。
结论:患者/护理人员是安全信息的重要来源,可以改善药物使用的系统和实践,而其他监视方法可能无法记录这些信息。管理人员和临床医生需要确定将患者/护理人员纳入常规报告的最佳方法,以实现最佳参与度。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录