STUDY DESIGN:A prospective review of patients undergoing epidural catheter placement after anterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent scoliosis was performed. Data were collected using visual analog pain scores reflecting the patients' perception of their pain control. OBJECTIVES:To present the authors' technique for epidural catheter placement and dosing protocol, and to demonstrate the results from postoperative pain control after anterior spinal instrumented fusion for 10 consecutive patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:The literature regarding the benefits of epidural catheters after spinal surgery is contradictory, even with controlled studies comparing epidural catheters with intravenous morphine patient-controlled anesthesia. The authors believe that this lack of consensus stems from varied epidural dosing protocols and techniques in catheter placement, which they have witnessed anecdotally at their own institution. This prompted the authors to develop and refine a standardized dosing and catheter placement protocol for pain control after spinal surgery. METHODS:Epidural catheters were placed intraoperatively before wound closure, then removed on postoperative Day 5. Dosing consisted of fentanyl (1 microg/kg) and hydromorphone (5 microg/kg) diluted in preservative-free saline (0.2 mL/kg). After surgery, dosing consisted of 0.1% ropivacaine and hydromorphone (10 microg/ml) continuously infused at 0.2 mL/kg/hour. Postoperative pain control was assessed on each postoperative day using a visual analog pain scale with choices ranging from 0 to 10. RESULTS:The arithmetic mean of the median pain scores after surgery was 2.1. The mean of the maximum pain scores for the 5 days was 4.1. Three patients required an epidural bolus and a 20% increase in the epidural infusion rate. One patient was judged to be excessively sleepy, so the epidural infusion rate was decreased by 20%. Pruritus requiring diphenhydramine developed in three patients. No other adverse effects related to epidural analgesia were noted. No catheters were accidentally pulled out or disconnected. CONCLUSION:By following the dosing protocol described, epidural catheters can be used safely and effectively to control postoperative pain after anterior instrumentation and spinal fusion for adolescent scoliosis.

译文

研究设计:对前路脊柱融合术和青春期脊柱侧弯器械置入硬膜外导管的患者进行了前瞻性评价。使用视觉模拟疼痛评分收集数据,以反映患者对疼痛控制的感知。
目的:介绍作者的硬膜外导管置入和给药方案技术,并演示连续10例患者经前路脊柱器械融合后术后疼痛控制的结果。
背景资料摘要:即使有比较硬膜外导管与静脉内吗啡患者自控麻醉的对照研究,有关脊柱外科手术后硬膜外导管益处的文献也相矛盾。作者认为,缺乏共识的原因在于导管置入过程中的各种硬膜外给药方案和技术,他们在自己的机构中轶事见证了这一点。这促使作者开发和完善用于脊柱手术后疼痛控制的标准化剂量和导管放置方案。
方法:在伤口闭合前术中放置硬膜外导管,然后在术后第5天取下。剂量由在无防腐剂盐水(0.2 mL / kg)中稀释的芬太尼(1 microg / kg)和氢吗啡酮(5 microg / kg)组成。手术后,剂量为0.1%罗哌卡因和氢吗啡酮(10微克/毫升),以0.2毫升/千克/小时的速度连续注入。在术后的每一天,使用视觉模拟疼痛量表(范围从0到10)评估术后疼痛的控制情况。
结果:手术后中位疼痛评分的算术平均值为2.1。 5天的最大疼痛评分平均值为4.1。三名患者需要硬膜外推注,硬膜外输注率增加20%。一名患者被判定为过度困倦,因此硬膜外输注率降低了20%。三名患者出现需要苯海拉明的瘙痒症。没有发现与硬膜外镇痛有关的其他不良反应。没有意外拔出或断开导管。
结论:按照所描述的给药方案,硬膜外导管可安全有效地控制青少年前路脊柱侧弯前路器械和脊柱融合术后的术后疼痛。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录