BACKGROUND:Effective health protection requires systematised responses with clear accountabilities. In England, Primary Care Trusts and the Health Protection Agency both have statutory responsibilities for health protection. A Memorandum of Understanding identifies responsibilities of both parties, but there is a potential lack of clarity about responsibility for specific health protection functions. We aimed to investigate professionals' perceptions of responsibility for different health protection functions, to inform future guidance for, and organisation of, health protection in England. METHODS:We sent a postal questionnaire to all health protection professionals in England from the following groups: (a) Directors of Public Health in Primary Care Trusts; (b) Directors of Health Protection Units within the Health Protection Agency; (c) Directors of Public Health in Strategic Health Authorities and; (d) Regional Directors of the Health Protection Agency RESULTS:The response rate exceeded 70%. Variations in perceptions of who should be, and who is, delivering health protection functions were observed within, and between, the professional groups (a)-(d). Concordance in views of which organisation should, and which does deliver was high (> or =90%) for 6 of 18 health protection functions, but much lower (< or =80%) for 6 other functions, including managing the implications of a case of meningitis out of hours, of landfill environmental contamination, vaccination in response to mumps outbreaks, nursing home infection control, monitoring sexually transmitted infections and immunisation training for primary care staff. The proportion of respondents reporting that they felt confident most or all of the time in the safe delivery of a health protection function was strongly correlated with the concordance (r = 0.65, P = 0.0038). CONCLUSION:Whilst we studied professionals' perceptions, rather than actual responses to incidents, our study suggests that there are important areas of health protection where consistent understanding of responsibility for delivery is lacking. There are opportunities to clarify the responsibility for health protection in England, perhaps learning from the approaches used for those health protection functions where we found consistent perceptions of accountability.

译文

背景:有效的健康保护要求系统化的应对措施和明确的责任感。在英格兰,初级保健基金会和健康保护局均负有健康保护的法定责任。谅解备忘录确定了双方的责任,但是对于特定健康保护职能的责任可能缺乏明确性。我们的目的是调查专业人员对不同健康保护职能的责任感,以期为英国的健康保护指导和组织提供参考。
方法:我们向以下各组向英国的所有卫生防护专业人员发送了邮政调查表:(a)初级保健信托基金的公共卫生主管; (b)卫生保护局内卫生保护部门的负责人; (c)战略卫生部门的公共卫生主管;以及(d)卫生保护局区域主任
结果:回应率超过70%。在专业团体(a)-(d)之内以及之间,观察到关于谁应该,谁应该发挥健康保护功能的观念上的差异。就18个卫生防护职能中的6个职能而言,哪个组织应该执行以及哪个组织确实提供了较高的意见(>或= 90%),而对于其他6个职能的意见一致较低(<或= 80%),包括管理非工作时间的脑膜炎,垃圾填埋场环境污染,应对腮腺炎疫情的疫苗接种,疗养院感染控制,性传播感染监测以及基层医疗人员的免疫培训。报告称大部分或全部时间他们对安全提供健康保护功能充满信心的受访者比例与一致性(r = 0.65,P = 0.0038)密切相关。
结论:虽然我们研究了专业人员的看法,而不是对事件的实际反应,但我们的研究表明,在健康保护的重要领域中,人们缺乏对交付责任的一致理解。在英国,有机会阐明健康保护的责任,也许是从那些发现健康问责制一致的健康保护职能的方法中学习。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录