The aim of the present study was to compare the value of telmisartan and enalapril on ventricular remodeling and kidney prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease complicated with diabetic nephropathy, and provide discussion on clinical reasonably chosen medicine. A total of 60 cases of coronary artery disease complicated with diabetic nephropathy were randomly divided for telmisartan (80 mg/day) treatment (n=32), enalapril (10 mg/day) treatment (n=28), while the rest of the therapy was kept the same. After 12 weeks, the clinical effects were compared between different groups. It was found that in comparison with enalapril group, the left ventricular ejection fraction of telmisartan group was significantly higher, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was significantly lower (P<0.05). The serum creatinine level and 24-h protein of telmisartan group were significantly lower than that for the enalapril group (P<0.05). In conclusion, the regular telmisartan treatment for patients with coronary artery disease complicated with diabetic nephropathy is better than enalapril on ventricular remodeling and kidney prognosis.

译文

:本研究的目的是比较替米沙坦和依那普利在冠心病合并糖尿病肾病患者心室重构和肾脏预后中的价值,并为临床合理选择药物提供讨论。随机将60例合并糖尿病肾病的冠心病患者随机分为替米沙坦(80 mg /天)治疗(n = 32),依那普利(10 mg / day)治疗(n = 28)。疗法保持不变。 12周后,比较不同组之间的临床效果。结果发现,与依那普利组相比,替米沙坦组左心室射血分数明显升高,而舒张末期左心室直径明显降低(P <0.05)。替米沙坦组的血清肌酐水平和24-h蛋白水平明显低于依那普利组(P <0.05)。综上所述,常规替米沙坦治疗冠心病合并糖尿病肾病的患者在心室重构和肾脏预后方面优于依那普利。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录