Background:  Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy (CHIEF) study is a large-scale randomised clinical trial across China, which compares the efficacy of two combination regimens in reducing cardiovascular events associated with hypertension. Methods:  We reported the 48-week efficacy and tolerability of the two antihypertensive regimens in participants from Shandong Province, China. Eligible patients aged 50-79 years were randomised to receive amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide (Group A) or amlodipine plus telmisartan (Group B). The doses of both regimens were titrated and other antihypertensive agents were added subsequently to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal (<140/90 mmHg for general population, <130/80 mmHg for diabetics and <150/90 mmHg for elderly). Efficacy variables included the changes of BP, control rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal), and response rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal or a reduction of BP ≥20/10 mmHg). Safety was assessed by monitoring the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results:  Of the 349 patients enrolled, 314 were randomised and 291 completed the study (141 in Group A and 150 in Group B). At week 48, the BP was reduced by 28.77/15.55 mmHg in Group A and by 31.38/16.07 mmHg in Group B (p > 0.05 for comparisons between Group A and Group B). The control rates (71.79% vs. 77.22%; p = 0.270) and response rates (79.49% vs. 84.81%; p = 0.218) were also similar. For both regimens, the control rates in diabetic patients were relatively lower (31.91% and 32.50%), while those in elderly patients were pretty higher (90.74% and 97.62%). AEs were mild to moderate in severity (17.95% vs. 12.66%, p = 0.193). Conclusion:  Both combination regimens, amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine plus telmisartan, were effective and safe for the high-risk hypertensive patients.

译文

:背景:中国高血压干预功效(CHIEF)研究是一项在中国进行的大规模随机临床试验,比较了两种联合用药方案在减少与高血压有关的心血管事件中的功效。方法:我们报道了来自中国山东省的两种降压方案的48周疗效和耐受性。年龄在50-79岁的符合条件的患者被随机分配接受氨氯地平加阿米洛利/氢氯噻嗪(A组)或氨氯地平加替米沙坦(B组)。两种治疗方案的剂量均需滴定,并随后添加其他降压药以达到血压(BP)目标(一般人群<140/90 mmHg,糖尿病患者<130/80 mmHg,老年人<150/90 mmHg)。疗效变量包括血压变化,控制率(达到血压目标的患者比例)和缓解率(达到血压目标或血压降低≥20/ 10mmHg的患者比例)。通过监测不良事件(AE)的发生率来评估安全性。结果:the在349名患者中,有314名被随机分组​​,其中291名完成了研究(A组141名,B组150名)。在第48周,A组的血压降低了28.77 / 15.55mmHg,B组的血压降低了31.38 / 16.07mmHg(A组和B组之间的比较,p> 0.05)。对照率(71.79%vs. 77.22%; p = 0.270)和缓解率(79.49%vs. 84.81%; p = 0.218)相似。对于这两种方案,糖尿病患者的控制率相对较低(31.91%和32.50%),而老年患者的控制率相对较高(90.74%和97.62%)。不良事件的严重程度为轻度至中度(17.95%对12.66%,p = 0.193)。结论:a氨氯地平加阿米洛利/氢氯噻嗪和氨氯地平加替米沙坦两种联合治疗方案对高危高血压患者均有效且安全。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录