PURPOSE:Prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) personnel, as initial responders to calls for assistance, are in an ideal position to identify abused or neglected elderly. A survey of prehospital personnel in Michigan was conducted to determine the scope of this problem, levels of awareness, and willingness to report cases of elder abuse. METHODS:The study population was a random sample of 500 prehospital personnel throughout one state. A blinded, self-administered survey was completed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics outlining their practice characteristics, prevalence of abuse in their community, and training available specific to elder abuse. Attitudes concerning the understanding and reporting of geriatric abuse were measured using a Likert-type scale. RESULTS:A total of 156 surveys (31%) was completed; 68% of the respondents were paramedics. Respondents had an average of 8.7 years (range: 9 months-30 years) of prehospital emergency-care experience, and evaluated an average of 11 patients (range: 1-59) older than 65 years of age each week. Seventy-eight percent had seen a suspected case of elder abuse or negligence during their careers; 68% had seen a case during the past 12 months (mean: 2.3 cases/yr; range: 0-24 cases/yr). However, surveyed personnel reported only 27% of suspected cases to authorities last year (mean: 0.62 cases/yr). Reasons for not reporting included 1) unsure which authorities take reports; 2) unclear definitions; 3) unaware of mandatory reporting laws; and 4) lack of anonymity. Ninety-five percent of respondents stated that training related to elder abuse was not available through their EMS agency. CONCLUSION:Paramedics and EMTs lack complete understanding of their role in the identification and reporting of elder abuse. This information should be emphasized during EMS training and reinforced through continuing education.

译文

目的:院前紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员,是寻求帮助的最初响应者,非常适合识别受虐待或被忽视的老人。对密歇根州的院前人员进行了一项调查,以确定该问题的范围,认识水平以及报告虐待老人情况的意愿。
方法:研究人群是在一个州内随机抽取500名院前人员的样本。紧急医疗技术人员(EMT)和护理人员完成了一项盲目,自我管理的调查,概述了他们的执业特点,社区中的虐待流行率以及针对老年人虐待的专门培训。使用李克特型量表测量有关理解和报告老年病滥用的态度。
结果:共完成156项调查(31%); 68%的受访者是护理人员。受访者平均有8.7年(范围:9个月至30年)的院前急诊服务经验,并且每周平均评估11名年龄在65岁以上的患者(范围:1-59)。 78%的人在其职业生涯中曾有过涉嫌虐待或疏忽老年人的案件;在过去的12个月中,有68%的人看过病例(平均:2.3例/年;范围:0-24例/年)。但是,去年接受调查的人员仅向当局报告了27%的可疑病例(平均:0.62例/年)。不报告的原因包括:1)不确定哪个当局进行报告; 2)定义不明确; 3)不了解强制性的汇报法律; 4)缺乏匿名性。 95%的受访者表示,无法通过其EMS机构进行与虐待老人相关的培训。
结论:医务人员和EMT对他们在识别和报告老年人虐待中的作用缺乏完全的了解。在EMS培训期间应强调此信息,并通过继续教育加以加强。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录