PURPOSE:Self-neglect is the most prevalent finding among cases reported to Adult Protective Services (APS) and is characterized by an inability to meet one's own basic needs. The Kohlman evaluation of living skills (KELS) has been validated in geriatric populations to assess performance with both instrumental and basic activities of daily living and as an assessment tool for the capacity to live independently; therefore, the purpose of this analysis was to compare the scores of the KELS between substantiated cases of self-neglect and matched community-dwelling elders. DATA SOURCES:This is a cross-sectional pilot study of 50 adults aged 65 years and older who were recruited from APS as documented cases of self-neglect and 50 control participants recruited from Harris County Hospital District outpatient clinics. Control participants were matched for age, race, gender, and ZIP code. A geriatric nurse practitioner (NP)-led team administered a comprehensive geriatric assessment in homes of all study participants. The assessment included the KELS and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) tests. Chi-square analyses were used to determine if cases of self-neglect were significantly more likely to fail the KELS test than matched controls. CONCLUSIONS:The analyses revealed that self-neglectors were significantly more likely to fail the KELS than non-self-neglectors (50% vs. 30%, p = .025). When stratified by MMSE scores, self-neglectors with intact cognitive function remained significantly more likely to fail the KELS compared to matched, cognitively intact controls (45% vs. 17%, p = .013). Abnormal results using an in-home KELS test were significantly associated with substantiated cases of self-neglect. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:There is currently no gold-standard measure for identifying capacity with self-care behaviors among cases of self-neglect. As a result, self-neglect may remain unidentified in many clinical settings. The KELS provides clinicians with an objective measure of an individual's capacity and performance with everyday life-supporting tasks and thus, provides information that can help NPs identify elders at risk for self-neglect. These findings suggest that the KELS test has significant utility as part of a comprehensive geriatric assessment to aid clinicians in suspected cases of self-neglect.

译文

目的:在向成人保护服务局(APS)报告的病例中,自我忽视是最普遍的发现,其特征是无法满足自己的基本需求。老年人口中的科尔曼生活技能评估(KELS)已得到验证,可以评估日常工具性和基础性活动的表现,并作为独立生活能力的评估工具;因此,本分析的目的是比较经证实的自我忽视案例与相匹配的社区居住长者之间的KELS得分。
数据来源:这是一项横断面先导研究,研究对象是从APS招募的50名65岁及65岁以上的成年人,因为有自我忽视的案例,还有50名从哈里斯县医院区门诊招募的对照参与者。对照参与者按年龄,种族,性别和邮政编码进行匹配。由老年护理执业医师(NP)领导的团队在所有研究参与者的家中进行了全面的老年评估。评估包括KELS和小精神状态检查(MMSE)测试。卡方分析用于确定自忽略的案例是否比匹配的对照组更有可能无法通过KELS测试。
结论:分析显示,自我忽视者比非自我忽视者更有可能失败KELS(50%vs. 30%,p = .025)。当按MMSE评分进行分层时,具有完整认知功能的自我忽视者与匹配的具有认知完整的对照相比,仍明显更有可能无法通过KELS(45%vs. 17%,p = .013)。使用居家KELS检验的异常结果与确诊的自我忽视病例显着相关。
实践的意义:目前尚无金标准的措施来识别自我忽视案例中具有自我照顾行为的能力。结果,在许多临床环境中自我疏忽可能仍然不明。 KELS为临床医生提供了衡量个人能力和表现的客观指标,以支持日常生活,从而提供了可以帮助NP识别有自我忽视风险的老年人的信息。这些发现表明,KELS测试作为全面的老年医学评估的一部分具有重要的用途,可在怀疑的自我忽视病例中为临床医生提供帮助。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录