BACKGROUND:Diarrhea is an important complication in critically ill patients undergoing enteral feeding. The occurrence of diarrhea may lead to systemic and local complications and negatively impacts on nursing workload and patient's wellbeing. An enteral feeding based on blenderized natural food could be beneficial in reducing the risk of diarrhea. No study has compared natural and commercial enteral feedings in critically ill cardiac surgery patients. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to compare the risk of diarrhea occurrence in two cohorts of patients fed a blenderized natural food diet or commercial enteral feeding preparations, respectively. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:Cardiac-Surgery Intensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS:Two-hundred and fifteen patients admitted to the postoperative cardiac surgery intensive care unit were included, 103 fed blenderized natural enteral feeding and 112 fed commercial formulas. METHODS:Commercial enteral formulas were delivered by continuous pump administration, while natural enteral feeding by bolus 3 times per day. Diarrhea was documented in the presence of three or more evacuations of loose or watery stool (or an amount above 250 ml) per day. The presence of diarrhea was recorded daily from the beginning to the end of the enteral feeding, up to a maximum of 8 days. The unadjusted time to the first event of diarrhea between the two enteral feeding groups was compared. Adjusted comparison was then performed by fitting a multivariable Cox Proportional-Hazards model, adjusted for potential confounders for diarrhea occurrence (i.e. administration of inotropes, vasopressors, prokinetics, antibiotics, oral nutritional supplements, antifungal agents, sedatives, opioids, probiotics, laxatives). RESULTS:In unadjusted survival analysis the probability of diarrhea was significantly lower in the natural enteral feeding group (log rank test: p = 0.023). In the multivariable model patients in natural enteral feeding cohort showed a non-significant trend towards an almost halved risk of experiencing diarrhea (hazard ratio: 0.584; 95% confidence interval: 0.335-1.018; p = 0.058) compared to those fed commercial enteral feeding. CONCLUSIONS:Administration of a blenderized diet based on natural food for enteral feeding can reduce the incidence of diarrhea in cardiac surgery critically ill patients. This strategy may reduce the risk of diarrhea-associated malnutrition and systemic and local complications, also having a positive impact on nursing workload and patient wellbeing.

译文

背景:腹泻是重症患者接受肠内喂养的重要并发症。腹泻的发生可能导致全身和局部并发症,并对护理工作量和患者的健康产生负面影响。以混合天然食品为基础的肠内喂养可能会减少腹泻的风险。尚无研究比较重症心脏手术患者的天然和商业性肠内喂养。
目的:本研究的目的是比较分别接受混合天然食物饮食或市售肠内喂养制剂的两个队列中发生腹泻的风险。
设计:回顾性队列研究。
单位:大学医院心脏外科重症监护室。
参与者:包括255名入院后心脏外科重症监护病房的患者,103例混合自然肠饲喂食和112例商业配方奶粉。
方法:商业性肠内配方是通过连续泵给药来实现的,而天然肠内则是每天推注3次。每天有3次或更多次疏散或水样大便(或250ml以上的量)排泄,证明腹泻。从肠内喂养开始至结束,每天记录腹泻的发生情况,最长不超过8天。比较了两个肠内进食组之间第一次腹泻事件的未调整时间。然后通过拟合多变量Cox比例危害模型进行校正后的比较,该模型针对腹泻发生的潜在混杂因素进行了校正(即,正性肌力药,升压药,促动力学药,抗生素,口服营养补品,抗真菌药,镇静剂,阿片类药物,益生菌,泻药)。
结果:在未经调整的生存分析中,天然肠内喂养组腹泻的可能性显着降低(对数秩检验:p = 0.023)。在多变量模型中,天然肠内喂养人群的腹泻风险几乎没有减低的趋势(危险比:0.584; 95%置信区间:0.335-1.018; p = 0.058)几乎没有一半; 。
结论:以天然食物为基础的混合饮食用于肠内喂养可减少心脏外科危重患者腹泻的发生率。该策略可以减少与腹泻相关的营养不良以及全身和局部并发症的风险,也可以对护理工作量和患者健康产生积极影响。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录