This work compared the impact of x-ray tube performance and automatic dose rate control (ADRC) parameter selection on system imaging efficiency of two Siemens angiography systems: a Siemens Megalix x-ray tube installed on an Artis Zee system (denoted 'MEGALIX') and a newer generation Gigalix x-ray tube installed on an Artis Q (denoted 'GIGALIX'). A method was used that accounted for two potential sources of bias in this comparison: differences in radiation output between the x-ray tubes and differences between the x-ray detectors on the two systems. First, ADRC x-ray factors (tube voltage, tube current, pulse length, focus size, spectral prefilter) and radiation output were recorded as a function of poly(methyl) methacrylate (PMMA) thickness on the MEGALIX unit. These factors were then applied manually on the GIGALIX system and incident air kerma rate (IAKR) and signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) were measured. Second, the ADRC on the GIGALIX system was used to give the x-ray factors and both IAKR and SDNR relevant to the GIGALIX based system directly. This method enabled the SDNR to be measured from images acquired on the same x-ray detector. SDNR and IAKR were measured on both systems using a PMMA phantom covering thicknesses from 6 cm to 40 cm. A small 0.3 mm iron insert was used to measure SDNR, which was then multiplied by modulation transfer function based weighting factors for focal spot blurring and motion blurring. These factors were evaluated for an object motion of 25 mm s-1 and at a spatial frequency of 1.4 mm-1 in the object plane, relevant to interventional cardiology, giving a spatial frequency dependent SDNR(u). In the second phase of the study, a technical figure of merit (FOM) was used to express imaging performance of both systems, calculated as SDNR2(u)/IAKR. Averaged over all phantom thicknesses, the FOM of the GIGALIX-based system was 42% and 73% higher compared to that of the MEGALIX based system, for fluoroscopy and acquisition mode respectively. The results indicate that increased x-ray tube power and smaller foci can improve overall system efficiency and reduce doses.

译文

这项工作比较了两个西门子血管造影系统的x射线管性能和自动剂量率控制 (ADRC) 参数选择对系统成像效率的影响: 安装在Artis Zee系统上的Siemens Megalix x射线管 (表示为 “Megalix”) 和安装在Artis Q上的新一代Gigalix x射线管 (表示为 “Gigalix”)。在此比较中,使用了一种方法来解释两个潜在的偏差源: x射线管之间的辐射输出差异和两个系统上的x射线检测器之间的差异。首先,将ADRC x射线因子 (管电压,管电流,脉冲长度,焦点大小,光谱预滤波器) 和辐射输出记录为MEGALIX单元上的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯 (PMMA) 厚度的函数。然后将这些因素手动应用于GIGALIX系统,并测量了入射空气比 (IAKR) 和信噪比 (SDNR)。其次,使用GIGALIX系统上的ADRC直接给出与基于GIGALIX的系统相关的x射线因子以及IAKR和SDNR。此方法使SDNR可以从在同一x射线检测器上获取的图像中测量。SDNR和IAKR在两个系统上使用覆盖厚度从6厘米到40厘米的PMMA体模测量。使用小的0.3毫米铁插入物来测量SDNR,然后将其乘以基于调制传递函数的加权因子以用于焦点模糊和运动模糊。评估这些因素的对象运动为25毫米s-1,并且在对象平面中的空间频率为1.4毫米-1,与介入心脏病学相关,给出了空间频率依赖性SDNR(u)。在研究的第二阶段,使用技术品质因数 (FOM) 表示两个系统的成像性能,计算为SDNR2(u)/IAKR。对于荧光透视和采集模式,与基于MEGALIX的系统相比,基于GIGALIX的系统的FOM在所有体模厚度上平均为42% 和73%。结果表明,增加x射线管功率和较小的病灶可以提高系统的整体效率并减少剂量。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录