OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety of midazolam after intravenous infusion or oral administration in preterm infants. METHODS ]PATIENTS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO INITIALLY RECEIVE MIDAZOLAM 0.1 MG/KG AS A 30-MINUTE INTRAVENOUS INFUSION OR AN ORAL BOLUS DOSE. IF PATIENTS STILL MET THE INCLUSION CRITERIA, THEY THEN RECEIVED MIDAZOLAM VIA THE ALTERNATE ROUTE (AFTER AN INTERVAL OF ≥72 HOURS). PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS CONSISTED OF A COMFORT® SCORE (A PREVIOUSLY VALIDATED SEDATION SCALE FOR PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS) AT BASELINE AND AT 0.5, 1, 2, 4 AND 6 HOURS POSTDOSE. MIDAZOLAM AND 1-OH-MIDAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS WERE MEASURED AND VITAL SIGNS WERE RECORDED AT ALL PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT TIMEPOINTS: RESULTS:A total of 24 infants were enrolled of whom seven received both intravenous and oral midazolam, 13 received only intravenous midazolam, and four received only oral midazolam. Overall, mean COMFORT® scores decreased (i.e. sedation increased) significantly within 30 minutes after intravenous (p S 0.05) and within 1 hour after oral (p = 0.003) midazolam administration. In 45% of patients the COMFORT® scores decreased little or not at all after midazolam, which was similar after both oral and intravenous administration. The sedative response to midazolam did not differ after intravenous or oral administration. No relationship was found between overall COMFORT® scores or change in COMFORT® score from baseline and midazolam, 1-OH-midazolam, or midazolam plus 1-OH-midazolam concentrations. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after intravenous (approximately 11%) but not after oral midazolam administration. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS:Midazolam administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion or oral bolus dose appears to be effective and well tolerated in a small majority of preterm infants. However, a considerable number of neonates do not appear to respond to midazolam. The lack of response may be due to the fact that patients truly experienced therapeutic failure and/or consequent to the inability of the COMFORT® score to adequately reflect sedation uniformly in sick preterm infants.

译文

目的:本研究旨在评估咪达唑仑在静脉输注或口服后对早产儿的药效学和安全性。方法随机分配患者30分钟静脉输注或口服口服剂量的咪达唑仑0.1毫克/千克。如果患者仍然符合纳入标准,则他们会通过替代路线(间隔≥72小时后)接收到咪达唑仑。基线时以及服药后0.5、1、2、4和6小时,由COMFORT®分数(一种经过验证的小儿患者镇静分数)组成的药动学测量。在所有药代动力学测量时间点测量了咪达唑仑和1-OH-咪唑啉的浓度,并记录了生命体征:
结果:共纳入24例婴儿,其中7例同时接受静脉和口服咪达唑仑治疗,13例仅接受静脉注射咪达唑仑治疗,4例仅接受口服咪达唑仑治疗。总体而言,静脉给予咪达唑仑后30分钟内(PS 0.05)和口服咪达唑仑1小时内(P = 0.003),平均COMFORT®评分显着降低(即镇静作用增加)。在咪达唑仑用药后,COMFORT®评分在45%的患者中几乎没有或根本没有下降,这在口服和静脉内给药后均相似。静脉或口服给药后,对咪达唑仑的镇静反应无差异。在总体COMFORT®分数或分数与基线和咪达唑仑,1-OH-咪达唑仑或咪达唑仑或咪达唑仑加1-OH-咪达唑仑浓度之间的变化之间未发现任何关系。静脉注射后舒张压显着下降(约11%),但口服咪达唑仑后并未降低。没有严重的不良反应的报道。
结论:咪达唑仑以30分钟静脉滴注或口服推注剂量给药对多数早产儿似乎是有效且耐受性良好的。但是,相当多的新生儿似乎对咪达唑仑没有反应。缺乏反应可能是由于患者确实经历了治疗失败和/或由于COMFORT®评分无法充分反映病态早产儿的镇静作用。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录