BACKGROUND:In the major trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the survival benefit of the therapy, relative to control subjects, increases with QRS duration. In the non-CRT heart failure population, however, a wide QRS duration is associated with a shorter survival. Relative survival benefit from a therapy, however, is not synonymous with a longer absolute survival. We sought to determine whether baseline QRS duration relates to the absolute survival after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS:In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study, 3,319 consecutive patients undergoing CRT (QRS 120-149 ms 26%, QRS 150-199 ms 58%, and QRS ≥200 ms 16%) were assessed in relation to mortality over 10 years. Overall mortality rates (per 100 patient-years) were 9.2%, 9.3%, and 13.3% in the 3 groups, respectively (all P < .001). Cardiac mortality rates were 6.2, 6.0, and 9.9 per 100 patient-years, respectively (all P < .001). Compared with the QRS 120-149 ms group, cardiac mortality was highest in the QRS ≥200 ms group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.72 [95% CI 1.35-2.19], P < .001), independent of age, gender, New York Heart Association class, presence of atrial fibrillation, heart failure etiology, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Median survival after CRT was longest in patients with a width of QRS 120-149 ms and shortest in patients with a QRS ≥200 ms (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, a QRS ≥200 ms emerged as a powerful independent predictor of both overall (HR 1.44 [95% CI 1.07-1.94], P = .017) and cardiac mortality (HR 1.59 [95% CI 1.14-2.24], P = .007). CONCLUSIONS:At long-term follow-up, absolute overall and cardiac survival after CRT is similar in patients with a preimplant QRS duration of 120 to 149 ms and 150 to 199 ms but markedly shorter in patients with a QRS ≥200 ms.