Communicability of rhinovirus type 16 or type 55 was studied in 24 childless couples; on partner (the donor) was infected with laboratory-grown virus. Initially, both partners lacked antibody to the challenge agent. Rates of transmission between partners were 41% and 33% for type 16 and type 55, respectively. These rates are similar to those determined in epidemiologic studies of natural rhinovirus infection. Although the mucosa of the anterior nares was shown to be highly susceptible to infection (less than one 50% tissue culture infective dose [TCID50]), transmission rarely occurred unless (1) at least 1,000 TCID50 of virus was recovered from the donor's nasal washing, (2) the donor had virus on his hands and anterior nares, (3) he was at least moderately symptomatic, and (4) he spent many hours with his spouse. Since person-to-person transfer of rhinovirus was so dependent upon time spent together and shedding of large amounts of virus by the donor, it seems possible that the chain of infection could be interrupted by environmental manipulation.

译文

在24对无子女夫妇中研究了16型或55型犀牛病毒的可传播性; 伴侣 (供体) 感染了实验室生长的病毒。最初,双方都缺乏针对挑战剂的抗体。16型和55型伴侣之间的传播率分别为41% 和33%。这些比率与自然鼻病毒感染的流行病学研究中确定的比率相似。尽管前鼻孔的粘膜被证明对感染高度敏感 (少于一50% 组织培养感染剂量 [TCID50]),但传播很少发生,除非 (1) 从供体的鼻腔冲洗中至少回收了1,000 TCID50病毒,(2) 捐献者的手和前鼻孔上有病毒; (3) 他至少有中度症状; (4) 他与配偶度过了许多小时。由于犀牛病毒的人与人之间的转移非常依赖于花费在一起的时间以及供体释放大量病毒,因此感染链似乎有可能因环境操纵而中断。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录