The goal of this study was to evaluate the cleaning ability of three acid irrigating solutions after hand and rotary instrumentation. Eighty human teeth were randomly divided in eight groups. Four groups were prepared with hand instrumentation and other four with ProTaper. The irrigating solutions were 15% citric acid plus 2.5% NaOCl; 15% EDTA plus 2.5% NaOCl; 5% orthophosphoric acid plus 2.5% NaOCl; and 2.5% NaOCl alone as control. Canal walls were observed with scanning electron microscopy, and photomicrographs were taken in apical, middle, and coronal thirds. A scoring system for debris and smear layer was used. Acid solutions with 2.5% NaOCl were effective in the elimination of smear layer or debris, and no significant differences were showed in smear layer removal between techniques. However, 2.5% NaOCl did not remove smear layer or debris, and no significant differences in debris were observed between manual and rotary techniques.

译文

这项研究的目的是评估手动和旋转仪器后三种酸灌溉溶液的清洁能力。将80颗人类牙齿随机分为八组。用手动仪器准备了四组,用ProTaper准备了另外四组。灌溉溶液是15% 柠檬酸加2.5% NaOCl; 15% EDTA加2.5% NaOCl; 5% 正磷酸加2.5% NaOCl; 和单独2.5% NaOCl作为对照。用扫描电子显微镜观察管壁,并在根尖,中部和冠状三分之二处拍摄显微照片。使用了碎片和涂抹层的评分系统。具有2.5% NaOCl的酸溶液可有效消除涂片层或碎屑,并且在技术之间的涂片层去除方面没有显示出显着差异。然而,2.5% NaOCl没有去除涂抹层或碎片,并且在手动和旋转技术之间没有观察到碎片的显着差异。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录