Over the past several decades, psychopharmacological treatments in psychiatry have been subjected to intensive methodological scrutiny in the continual assessment of their efficacy and safety. Although one of the most dramatic and controversial therapeutic approaches in psychiatry, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has not received the same concentrated, systematic attention. Through a comprehensive literature search, the present authors have attempted to provide answers relating to the efficacy and the safety of conventional ECT and some of its more prominent variations. Although specific discernible trends are reported in the text, results of the survey are too disparate for a simplistic summary statement to be made regarding efficacy in all diagnostic categories. As with most somatic treatments in psychiatry, bilateral ECT does present some apparent risk, reduced but not entirely eliminated by precautionary techniques, which must be weighed against the possible benefits to be derived in a given case. Other variations of ECT offer promise of fewer side effects but must be accepted as standard clinical practice.

译文

在过去的几十年中,精神病学中的心理药物治疗在不断评估其功效和安全性方面受到了严格的方法学审查。尽管电惊厥疗法 (ECT) 是精神病学中最具戏剧性和争议的治疗方法之一,但并未受到同样集中,系统的关注。通过全面的文献检索,本作者试图提供有关常规ECT的功效和安全性及其一些更突出的变体的答案。尽管在文本中报告了具体的可辨别趋势,但调查结果过于分散,无法就所有诊断类别的功效做出简单的摘要陈述。与精神病学中的大多数躯体疗法一样,双侧ECT确实存在一些明显的风险,通过预防技术可以降低但不能完全消除,因此必须权衡在特定情况下可能获得的收益。ECT的其他变体有望带来较少的副作用,但必须被接受为标准的临床实践。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录