This article discusses under what circumstances patients who are suffering from senile dementia or mental retardation should be submitted to coercive care, who should decide about this kind of coercion, and in what legal framework it should take place. A distinction is drawn between modest (i.e. of moderate degree) and meddlesome coercion. The use of modest coercion is defended. It is argued that medical personnel ought to decide exclusively about the use of modest coercion. However, no law should render legitimate the use of even modest coercion. It is conceded that to prohibit the use of a kind of coercion that is expected to take place is hypocrisy. It is argued that this is, however, an acceptable form of hypocrisy.

译文

本文讨论了在什么情况下患有老年性痴呆或智力低下的患者应接受强制护理,谁应决定这种强制,以及应在何种法律框架下进行。适度 (即中等程度) 和多管闲事的胁迫之间有区别。使用适度的胁迫是辩护的。有人认为,医务人员应该完全决定使用适度的胁迫。但是,任何法律都不应使使用适度的胁迫成为合法。人们承认,禁止使用预期会发生的一种胁迫是虚伪的。有人认为,这是一种可以接受的虚伪形式。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录