Periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS) are repetitive, stereotyped movements that can disrupt sleep and result in insomnia, non-restorative sleep, and/or daytime sleepiness. Currently, polysomnography is the gold standard and only clinically acceptable means of quantifying PLMS. Leg-worn actigraphy is an alternative method of measuring PLMS, which may circumvent many of the economic and technical limitations of polysomnography to quantify nocturnal leg movements. However, the use of leg actigraphy as a diagnostic means of assessing PLMS has not been systematically evaluated. In this review, the use of leg-worn actigraphy to measure PLMS is systematically evaluated, using both qualitative and quantitative assessment. Findings demonstrate significant heterogeneity among a limited number of studies in terms of type of actigraph utilized, position of the device on the lower extremity, and methods employed to count PLMS. In general, common accelerometers vary in their sensitivity and specificity to detect PLMS, which is likely related to the technical specifications of a given device. A current limitation in the ability to combine data from actigraphs placed on both legs is also a significant barrier to their use in clinical settings. Further research is required to determine the optimal methods to quantify PLMS using leg actigraphy, as well as specific clinical situations in which these devices may prove most useful.

译文

周期性的肢体睡眠运动 (plm) 是重复的,刻板的运动,可能会破坏睡眠并导致失眠,非恢复性睡眠和/或白天嗜睡。目前,多导睡眠监测是定量plm的金标准,并且是临床上可接受的方法。腿部运动描记术是一种测量plm的替代方法,它可以规避多导睡眠描记术量化夜间腿部运动的许多经济和技术限制。但是,尚未系统地评估使用腿部活动描记术作为评估plm的诊断手段。在这篇综述中,使用定性和定量评估系统地评估了使用腿穿的动作描记术来测量plm。研究结果表明,在使用的活动仪类型,设备在下肢的位置以及用于计数plm的方法方面,在数量有限的研究中存在显着的异质性。通常,常见的加速度计检测plm的灵敏度和特异性各不相同,这可能与给定设备的技术规格有关。当前对来自两条腿上的活动图的数据进行组合的能力的限制也是其在临床环境中使用的重大障碍。需要进一步的研究来确定使用腿部活动仪量化plm的最佳方法,以及这些设备可能最有用的特定临床情况。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录