BACKGROUND:In some Western countries, the medical profession is continuously losing prestige, doctors are claiming of high demands, low rewards, and difficult structural working conditions. This study aimed to investigate the arguments given by Swiss residents for and against a career in medicine. METHODS:As part of a prospective cohort study of Swiss medical school graduates on career development, 567 fourth-year residents were asked to answer the free-response item of what arguments there still were in favour of or against a career in medicine. They also indicated whether they would choose the medical profession all over again (yes/no). The statements were transcribed, content categories inductively formulated, and their descriptions written down in a code manual. Arguments were encoded according to the code manual and assigned to eight content categories (Mayring's content analysis). Frequency distributions were given for categories and tested with Chi2-tests for differences in gender, speciality fields, and whether or not the respondent would again choose a career in medicine. RESULTS:The 567 participants made 1,640 statements in favour of and 1,703 statements against a career in medicine. The content analysis of the residents' answers yielded eight categories with arguments both for and against a career in medicine. Of all "statements for" responses, 70% fell into the two top-ranking categories of Personal experiences in day-to-day working life (41.2%) and Interpersonal experiences in professional relationships (28.8%). The top-ranking category of the "statements against" arguments was General work-related structural conditions (32%), followed by Social prestige and health-policy aspects (21%). Main arguments in favour of a career in medicine were interdisciplinary challenge, combination of basic sciences and interpersonal concerns, helping suffering people, guarantee of a secure job; arguments against comprised high workload, time pressure, emotional stress, poorly structured continuing education, increasing bureaucracy, work-life imbalance, low income, and decreasing social prestige. The statements revealed few differences depending on gender, medical field, and attitude towards choosing the medical profession again; one out of five young doctors would not do so. CONCLUSION:Residents' chief complaint is deteriorating structural working conditions, including unfavourable work-life balance. Making medicine an attractive profession again will require sustainable changes in health-policy framework and social reward.

译文

背景:在某些西方国家,医学界一直在失去声望,医生声称要求高,报酬低并且结构性工作条件艰苦。这项研究旨在调查瑞士居民支持和反对医学职业的观点。
方法:作为对瑞士医学院毕业生职业发展的一项前瞻性队列研究的一部分,要求567名四年级居民回答自由回答的问题,即哪些观点仍然支持或反对医学职业。他们还指出是否会再次选择医学专业(是/否)。语句被转录,内容分类归纳,并在代码手册中记录了它们的描述。根据代码手册对参数进行编码,并将其分配给八个内容类别(Mayring的内容分析)。给出了频率分布的类别,并通过Chi2-test进行了测试,以检查性别,专业领域的差异以及受访者是否会再次选择从事医学职业。
结果:567名参与者发表了1,640项赞成的陈述,而1,703项反对医学职业的陈述。居民回答的内容分析产生了八类,分别支持和反对医学职业。在所有“回应声明”中,有70%属于日常工作生活中的个人经历(41.2%)和人际关系中的职业经历(28.8%)这两个最重要的类别。 “反对声明”论证中排名最高的类别是与一般工作有关的结构性条件(32%),其次是社会声望和卫生政策方面(21%)。支持医学职业的主要论据是跨学科的挑战,基础科学与人际关系的结合,帮助受苦的人们,确保一份稳定的工作;反对意见包括工作量大,时间压力大,情绪紧张,继续教育结构不良,官僚主义加剧,工作生活失衡,低收入和社会声望下降。声明显示,根据性别,医学领域和对再次选择医学专业的态度,差异不大。五分之一的年轻医生不会这样做。
结论:居民的主要抱怨是结构性工作条件的恶化,包括不利于工作与生活的平衡。要使医学再次成为有吸引力的行业,将需要健康政策框架和社会奖励的可持续变化。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录