Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been reported as an independent predictor of patient outcome in cervical carcinoma. However, not all studies support independent significance, especially in multivariable analyses. A risk stratification system recently introduced for endocervical adenocarcinoma was reported to better predict risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis. A subset of patients with tumors with pattern C features had LN metastasis and died of disease. In this study, we determined whether LVI had any additional significance in this subset of tumors. A total of 127 patients with pattern C tumors and at least 12-month follow-up were included. Tumors were separated into 3 subgroups. Those with no LVI and negative LNs represented 41 cases; most patients (36, 88%) were alive with no evidence of disease at last follow-up, whereas 4 (10%) died of disease, all after tumor recurrence/metastasis. Tumors with LVI, but negative LNs, represented 55 cases; recurrences were seen in 10 (18%) patients, of which 5 (50%) of them died of disease; remaining 5 patients are alive with persistent disease. Tumors with both LVI and positive LNs represented 31 cases; recurrences were seen in 13 (42%) patients; 11 (85%) patients died of disease and 2 are alive with persistent disease. One additional patient who presented with advanced stage also died of disease. Tumor size, horizontal spread, and LN status were significantly associated with outcome in univariate, but not in multivariable analysis; depth of invasion was not a predictor of outcome. Tumors with no LVI and negative LNs behaved significantly less aggressively than tumors with both LVI and positive LNs (P<0.01). LVI status (independent of LN status) was not significantly associated with patient outcome, although approached significance (P=0.06). In conclusion, LVI is a prerequisite for LN metastasis; however, by itself is not sufficient to predict tumor aggressiveness, whereas over 50% of patients with positive LNs died of disease. Stratifying pattern C tumors into subgroups based on LVI and LN status could further determine treatment in patients with pattern C tumors.

译文

:淋巴管浸润(LVI)被报告为宫颈癌患者预后的独立预测因子。但是,并非所有研究都支持独立意义,尤其是在多变量分析中。据报道,最近针对宫颈内膜腺癌引入的风险分层系统可以更好地预测淋巴结转移的风险。具有C型特征的部分肿瘤患者发生LN转移并死于疾病。在这项研究中,我们确定LVI在这部分肿瘤中是否还有其他意义。总共包括127位患有C型肿瘤且至少随访12个月的患者。将肿瘤分为3个亚组。没有LVI和LN阴性的患者代表41例;大多数患者(36%,88%)在最后一次随访时还活着,没有疾病的迹象,而4名(10%)死于疾病,都是在肿瘤复发/转移之后。 LVI阴性但LN阴性的肿瘤代表55例。 10例(18%)患者复发,其中5例(50%)死于疾病;其余5例患者仍患有持续性疾病。 LVI和LN阳性的肿瘤共占31例。 13例(42%)患者复发。 11名(85%)患者死于疾病,另有2例患有持续性疾病。另一位晚期患者也死于疾病。在单变量中,肿瘤大小,水平扩散和LN状态与预后显着相关,而在多变量分析中则无相关性。浸润深度不是预后的指标。没有LVI和LN阴性的肿瘤的侵袭性明显低于同时存在LVI和LN阳性的肿瘤(P <0.01)。 LVI状态(独立于LN状态)与患者预后没有显着相关性,尽管已接近显着性(P = 0.06)。总之,LVI是LN转移的先决条件。然而,仅靠其自身不足以预测肿瘤的侵袭性,而超过50%的LN阳性患者死于疾病。根据LVI和LN状况将C型肿瘤分为亚组可以进一步确定C型肿瘤患者的治疗方法。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录