BACKGROUND:The optimal treatment for acute bronchitis is not clear. Because many patients with acute bronchitis have airflow limitation as well as cough, beta2-agonists may be useful. OBJECTIVES:To determine whether beta2-agonists improve the symptoms of acute bronchitis in patients who do not have underlying pulmonary disease. SEARCH STRATEGY:The Cochrane Library (through August 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to 2000), EMBASE (1974 to 2000), and Conference Proceedings using "bronchodilator (exp)", "adrenergic beta-agonist (exp)", or "sympathomimetics (exp)" and "bronchitis" or "cough"; Science Citation Index for referenced publications; and letters to manufacturers of beta2-agonists. An updated search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 3, 2003); MEDLINE (January 2000 to July 2003); EMBASE (January 2000 to July 2003) was run in July 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA:Trials in which patients (adults or children over two years of age) without known pulmonary disease who were diagnosed with acute bronchitis or acute cough without other cause were randomized to beta2-agonist versus placebo, no treatment, or alternative treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:Three reviewers independently first selected outcomes and evaluated trial quality while blinded to study results, and then extracted data. Trials in children and in adults were analyzed separately. MAIN RESULTS:Two trials in children (n = 109) with acute cough and no evidence of airway obstruction did not find any benefits from beta2-agonists. Combined data did not show a significant difference in daily cough scores between patients given oral beta2-agonists and those in the control groups. Five trials in adults (n = 418) with acute cough or acute bronchitis had mixed results, but overall summary statistics did not reveal any significant benefits from oral (three trials) nor inhaled (two trials) beta2-agonists. There were no significant differences in daily cough scores nor in the number of patients still coughing after seven days (control rate 73%; RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.54-1.09). Subgroups of patients with evidence of airflow limitation had lower symptom scores if given beta2-agonists in one trial; and the trials that did note quicker resolution of cough in patients given beta2-agonists were those that had a higher proportion of patients with wheezing at baseline. Patients given beta2-agonists were more likely to report tremor, shakiness, or nervousness than patients in the control groups (for trials in children control rate 0%; RR 6.76, 95% CI 0.86 to 53.12, NNH 9, 95% CI 5 to 100; for trials in adults, control rate 11%; RR 7.94, 95% CI 1.17 to 53.94, NNH 2.3, 95% CI 2 to 3). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:There is no evidence to support using beta2-agonists in children with acute cough who do not have evidence of airflow obstruction. There is also little evidence that the routine use of beta2-agonists for adults with acute cough is helpful. These agents may reduce symptoms, including cough, in patients with evidence of airflow obstruction; but this potential benefit is not well-supported by the available data and must be weighed against the adverse effects associated with beta2-agonists.

译文

背景:急性支气管炎的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。由于许多急性支气管炎患者都有气流受限和咳嗽,因此β2-激动剂可能会有用。
目的:确定β2-激动剂是否可改善无基础肺部疾病的患者的急性支气管炎症状。
搜索策略:Cochrane库(到2000年8月),MEDLINE(1966年到2000年),EMBASE(1974年到2000年)和使用“支气管扩张剂(exp)”,“肾上腺素β激动剂(exp)”或“拟交感神经药”的会议录(exp)”和“支气管炎”或“咳嗽”;参考出版物的《科学引文索引》;以及给beta2激动剂制造商的信。对“ Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿”(CENTRAL)的最新搜索(2003年第3期); MEDLINE(2000年1月至2003年7月); EMBASE(2000年1月至2003年7月)于2003年7月运行。
选择标准:将没有已知肺部疾病的被诊断患有急性支气管炎或无其他原因的急性咳嗽的患者(成人或两岁以上的儿童)随机分配给β2受体激动剂和安慰剂,不予治疗或替代治疗。
数据收集与分析:三名审阅者在不了解研究结果的情况下,首先独立选择结果并评估了试验质量,然后提取了数据。对儿童和成人的试验分别进行了分析。
主要结果:两项针对急性咳嗽且无气道阻塞证据的儿童(n = 109)的试验均未发现beta2激动剂有任何益处。组合数据未显示口服β2受体激动剂的患者与对照组的每日咳嗽评分有显着差异。在成人(418例)患有急性咳嗽或急性支气管炎的试验中,有五项结果好坏参半,但是总体统计数据并未显示口服(三项试验)或吸入(两项试验)β2-激动剂有任何明显的益处。每天的咳嗽评分和7天后仍咳嗽的患者人数均无显着差异(控制率73%; RR = 0.77,95%CI 0.54-1.09)。如果在一项试验中给予β2-激动剂,则有气流受限证据的患者亚组的症状评分较低。确实注意到在使用β2受体激动剂的患者中咳嗽得到更快缓解的试验是那些基线时出现喘息的患者比例更高的试验。与对照组相比,接受过β2受体激动剂治疗的患者更有可能出现震颤,颤抖或神经过敏(儿童试验中,对照组的控制率为0%; RR为6.76,95%CI为0.86至53.12,NNH为9,95%CI为5至100;对于成人试验,控制率11%; RR 7.94,95%CI 1.17至53.94,NHN 2.3,95%CI 2至3)。
审查者的结论:没有证据支持在没有气流阻塞迹象的急性咳嗽儿童中使用β2激动剂。也几乎没有证据表明,对患有急性咳嗽的成人常规使用β2受体激动剂是有帮助的。这些药物可以减轻有气流阻塞迹象的症状,包括咳嗽。但是现有的数据并不能很好地支持这种潜在的好处,因此必须权衡与beta2-激动剂相关的不利影响。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录