OBJECTIVES:To examine physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars. DESIGN:Systematic review. DATA SOURCES:MedLine Ovid and Scopus databases at the end of 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:Original scientific studies written in English that addressed physicians' perceptions of the uptake of biosimilars. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS:The search resulted in altogether 451 studies and 331 after removing duplicates. Two researchers examined these based on the title, abstract and entire text, resulting in 20 studies. The references in these 20 studies were screened and three further studies were included. The data of these 23 studies were extracted. All the publications were quality assessed by two researchers. RESULTS:Most of the selected studies were conducted in Europe and commonly used short surveys. Physicians' familiarity with biosimilars varied: 49%-76% were familiar with biosimilars while 2%-25% did not know what biosimilars were, the percentages varying from study to study. Their measured knowledge was generally more limited compared with their self-assessed knowledge. Physicians' perceptions of biosimilars also varied: 54%-94% were confident prescribing biosimilars, while 65%-67% had concerns regarding these medicines. Physicians seemed to prefer originator products to biosimilars and prescribed biosimilars mainly for biologic-naive patients. They considered cost savings and the lower price compared with the originator biologic medicine as the main advantages of biosimilars, while their doubts were often related to safety, efficacy and immunogenicity. 64%-95% of physicians had negative perceptions of pharmacist-led substitution of biologic medicines. CONCLUSIONS:Physicians' knowledge of and attitudes towards biosimilars vary. Although physicians had positive attitudes towards biosimilars, prescribing was limited, especially for patients already being treated with biologic medicines. Perceptions of pharmacist-led substitution of biologic medicines were often negative. Education and national recommendations for switching and substitution of biologic medicines are needed to support the uptake of biosimilars.

译文

目的:检查医生对生物仿制药使用的看法。
设计:系统评价。
数据来源:2018年底的MedLine Ovid和Scopus数据库。
资格标准:以英语撰写的原始科学研究,涉及医生对生物仿制药的吸收的看法。
数据提取与合成:检索共进行451项研究,除去重复项后进行331项研究。两名研究人员根据标题,摘要和全文研究了这些内容,从而进行了20项研究。筛选了这20项研究中的参考文献,并纳入了三项进一步的研究。提取了这23项研究的数据。所有出版物均由两名研究人员进行质量评估。
结果:大多数选定的研究是在欧洲进行的,并且是常用的短期调查。医生对生物仿制药的熟悉程度各不相同:49%-76%的人对生物仿制药很熟悉,而2%-25%的人不知道什么是生物仿制药,不同研究的百分比不同。与他们自己评估的知识相比,他们测得的知识通常更受限制。医师对生物仿制药的看法也各不相同:54%-94%的人对开具生物仿制药有信心,而65%-67%的人对这些药物感到担忧。医生似乎更喜欢原始产品,而不是生物仿制药和开具生物仿制药的处方药,主要是针对未接触过生物的患者。他们认为与仿制生物药品相比,节省成本和降低价格是生物仿制药的主要优势,而他们的疑问通常与安全性,功效和免疫原性有关。 64%-95%的医生对药剂师主导的生物药物替代品持否定态度。
结论:医师对生物仿制药的了解和态度各不相同。尽管医师们对生物仿制药持积极态度,但开处方是有限的,特别是对于已经接受过生物药物治疗的患者。由药剂师主导的生物药物替代品的认识通常是负面的。需要为转用和替代生物药物提供教育和国家建议,以支持生物仿制药的使用。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录