We compared the effects of 8-weeks of rhythm and robotic interventions with those of a comparison, standard-of-care intervention, on the spontaneous and responsive social attention patterns of school-age children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Attention patterns were examined within a standardized pretest/posttest measure of joint attention (JA) and a training-specific social attention measure during early, mid, and late training sessions. The rhythm and comparison groups demonstrated improvements in JA. Social attention was greater in the rhythm followed by the robot and lastly the comparison group. The robot and comparison groups spent maximum time fixating on the robot and objects, respectively. Across sessions, the robot group decreased attention to the robot and increased attention to elsewhere. Overall, rhythmic movement contexts afford sustained social monitoring in children with autism.

译文

我们比较了8周的节律和机器人干预与比较的护理标准干预对自闭症谱系障碍学龄儿童自发和反应迅速的社会注意模式的影响。在早期,中期和晚期培训课程中,在标准化的联合注意力 (JA) 前测试/后测试措施和针对特定培训的社会注意力措施中检查了注意力模式。节奏和比较组显示了JA的改善。机器人,最后是比较组的节奏,社会关注度更高。机器人和比较组分别花费最大时间固定在机器人和物体上。在整个会议期间,机器人小组减少了对机器人的关注,并增加了对其他地方的关注。总体而言,有节奏的运动环境为自闭症儿童提供了持续的社会监测。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录