The current trial examined the value of modifying empirically validated treatment for childhood anxiety for application via written materials for parents of anxious children. Two hundred sixty-seven clinically anxious children ages 6-12 years and their parents were randomly allocated to standard group treatment, waitlist, or a bibliotherapy version of treatment for childhood anxiety. In general, parent bibliotherapy demonstrated benefit for children relative to waitlist but was not as efficacious as standard group treatment. Relative to waitlist, use of written materials for parents with no therapist contact resulted in around 15% more children being free of an anxiety disorder diagnosis after 12 and 24 weeks. These results have implications for the dissemination and efficient delivery of empirically validated treatment for childhood anxiety.

译文

当前的试验研究了修改经经验验证的儿童焦虑症治疗的价值,以通过书面材料为焦虑儿童的父母应用。将67名6-12岁的临床焦虑儿童及其父母随机分配到标准组治疗,候补名单或针对儿童焦虑症的书目疗法版本。通常,相对于候补名单,父母书目疗法对儿童具有益处,但效果不如标准组治疗。相对于候补名单,没有治疗师联系的父母使用书面材料导致大约15% 多的孩子在12周和24周后没有焦虑症诊断。这些结果对传播和有效实施经经验验证的儿童焦虑症治疗有影响。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录