Background:  Chinese Hypertension Intervention Efficacy (CHIEF) study is a large-scale randomised clinical trial across China, which compares the efficacy of two combination regimens in reducing cardiovascular events associated with hypertension. Methods:  We reported the 48-week efficacy and tolerability of the two antihypertensive regimens in participants from Shandong Province, China. Eligible patients aged 50-79 years were randomised to receive amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide (Group A) or amlodipine plus telmisartan (Group B). The doses of both regimens were titrated and other antihypertensive agents were added subsequently to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal (<140/90 mmHg for general population, <130/80 mmHg for diabetics and <150/90 mmHg for elderly). Efficacy variables included the changes of BP, control rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal), and response rates (the proportion of patients achieving a BP goal or a reduction of BP ≥20/10 mmHg). Safety was assessed by monitoring the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results:  Of the 349 patients enrolled, 314 were randomised and 291 completed the study (141 in Group A and 150 in Group B). At week 48, the BP was reduced by 28.77/15.55 mmHg in Group A and by 31.38/16.07 mmHg in Group B (p > 0.05 for comparisons between Group A and Group B). The control rates (71.79% vs. 77.22%; p = 0.270) and response rates (79.49% vs. 84.81%; p = 0.218) were also similar. For both regimens, the control rates in diabetic patients were relatively lower (31.91% and 32.50%), while those in elderly patients were pretty higher (90.74% and 97.62%). AEs were mild to moderate in severity (17.95% vs. 12.66%, p = 0.193). Conclusion:  Both combination regimens, amlodipine plus amiloride/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine plus telmisartan, were effective and safe for the high-risk hypertensive patients.

译文

背景:   中国高血压干预疗效 (CHIEF) 研究是一项在中国各地进行的大规模随机临床试验,比较两种联合方案在降低高血压相关心血管事件方面的疗效。方法:   我们报告了来自中国山东省的两种降压方案的48周疗效和耐受性。50-79岁的符合条件的患者被随机分为氨氯地平联合阿米洛利/氢氯噻嗪 (A组) 或氨氯地平联合替米沙坦 (B组)。两种方案的剂量均进行滴定,随后添加其他降压药以达到血压 (BP) 目标 (普通人群 <140/90  mmHg,糖尿病患者 <130/80  mmHg,老年人 <150/90  mmHg)。疗效变量包括血压变化、控制率 (达到血压目标的患者比例) 和缓解率 (达到血压目标或降低血压 ≥ 20/10  mmHg的患者比例)。通过监测不良事件 (AEs) 的发生率来评估安全性。结果: 在纳入的349例患者中,314例被随机分组,291完成研究 (A组141例,B组150例)。48周时,A组血压降低28.77/15.55  mmHg,B组血压降低31.38/16.07  mmHg (A组与B组比较p  >  0.05)。控制率 (71.79% 对77.22%; P   =   0.270) 和应答率 (79.49% 对84.81%; P   =   0.218) 也相似。对于这两种方案,糖尿病患者的控制率相对较低 (31.91% 和32.50%),而老年患者的控制率相对较高 (90.74% 和97.62%)。AEs的严重程度为轻至中度 (17.95% vs. 12.66%,p   =   0.193)。结论: 氨氯地平联合阿米洛利/氢氯噻嗪和氨氯地平联合替米沙坦治疗高危高血压患者均安全有效。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录