This meta-analysis was designed to determine the effect of an intracardiac lateral tunnel (ILT) versus an extracardiac conduit (ECC) on patients undergoing a Fontan procedure. A search of the literature in PubMed, Embase, China Academic Literature, and Wanfang databases yielded 23 studies comprising approximately 1000 patients for analysis. There were statistically significant differences between ILT and ECC in the frequency of early sinus node dysfunction, early total arrhythmias, late supraventricular tachycardia, late sinus node dysfunction, late total arrhythmias, and need for pacemaker. By contrast, no statistically significant differences between the two methods were found in takedown, protein-losing enteropathy, thromboembolic events, early supraventricular tachycardia, early mortality, and total mortality. We conclude that an ECC confers some advantages over an ILT, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear.

译文

:本荟萃分析旨在确定心脏内外侧隧道(ILT)与心脏外导管(ECC)对接受Fontan手术的患者的影响。在PubMed,Embase,中国学术文献和Wanfang数据库中对文献进行搜索后,得出23项研究,包括大约1000例患者以进行分析。 ILT和ECC在早期窦房结功能障碍,早期总心律不齐,晚期室上性心动过速,晚期窦房结功能障碍,晚期总心律不齐和需要起搏器的频率上有统计学差异。相比之下,两种方法在下陷,蛋白质丢失性肠病,血栓栓塞事件,早期室上性心动过速,早期死亡率和总死亡率方面没有统计学上的显着差异。我们得出的结论是,尽管底层机制仍然不清楚,但ECC相对于ILT具有一些优势。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录