BACKGROUND:Professional organizations have issued guidelines recommending breast cancer screening for women 50 years of age. OBJECTIVE:This study examines the percent of U.S. primary care physicians who report breast cancer screening practices that are not consistent with guidelines, and the characteristics of physicians who reported offering extra test modalities. DESIGN:We analyzed a subset of a 2008 cross-sectional Women's Health Care survey sent to primary care physicians randomly selected from the national American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Masterfile. A subset of physicians received a survey that presented a vignette of a health maintenance visit for an asymptomatic 51-year-old woman who was not at high risk for breast cancer. Responses were weighted to represent physicians nationally. PARTICIPANTS:1,654 U.S. family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists under age 65, who practiced in office or hospital based settings (62.8 % response rate). After exclusions, 553 study physicians remained for analysis. MAIN MEASURE:Physician self-report of breast cancer screening practices that are not consistent with the recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), and the American Cancer Society (ACS), defined as almost always offering mammography. KEY RESULTS:36.0 % (95 % CI: 31.8 %-40.5 %) of physicians reported offering breast cancer screening tests inconsistent with national guidelines, with most offering extra tests (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and/or ultrasound) (33.2 %, 95 % CI 29.1 %-37.6 %). In adjusted analysis, risk-averse physicians and those who believed in the clinical effectiveness of MRI were more likely to offer extra breast cancer screening tests. CONCLUSIONS:Physicians often report offering breast cancer screening test modalities beyond those recommended for a 51-year-old woman. Strategies, such as academic detailing regarding appropriate use of technology and provision of clinical decision support for breast cancer screening, could decrease overuse of resources.

译文

背景:专业组织已发布指南,建议对50岁以下的女性进行乳腺癌筛查。
目的:本研究调查了报告乳腺癌筛查实践与指南不一致的美国基层医疗医生的百分比,以及报告提供额外测试方式的医生的特征。
设计:我们分析了2008年横断面的妇女健康护理调查的一部分,该调查发送给从美国国家医学会(AMA)医师主档案中随机选择的初级保健医生。一部分医生接受了一项调查,该调查显示了对没有患乳腺癌高风险的无症状51岁女性进行健康维持就诊的情况。回答权重代表全国范围内的医师。
参与者:1,654位65岁以下的美国家庭医生,普通内科医师和妇产科医师,他们在办公室或医院工作(应答率为62.8%)。排除后,有553名研究医师留待分析。
主要测量:医师对乳腺癌筛查实践的自我报告与美国预防服务工作队(USPSTF),美国妇产科学院(ACOG)和美国癌症协会(ACS)的建议不一致,被定义为几乎总是提供乳房X光检查。
关键结果:36.0%(95%CI:31.8%-40.5%)的医生报告说提供的乳腺癌筛查检查与国家指南不一致,大多数提供额外的检查(磁共振成像[MRI]和/或超声检查)(33.2%, 95%CI 29.1%-37.6%)。在调整后的分析中,规避风险的医生和那些相信MRI的临床有效性的医生更有可能提供额外的乳腺癌筛查测试。
结论:医师通常报告提供了超出推荐给51岁女性的乳腺癌筛查检查方法。策略,例如关于适当使用技术的学术细节以及为乳腺癌筛查提供临床决策支持,可以减少资源的过度使用。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录