OBJECTIVES:Previous studies found that hospital and specialty have limited influence on patient experience scores, and patient level factors are more important. This could be due to heterogeneity of experience delivery across subunits within organisations. We aimed to determine whether organisation level factors have greater impact if scores for the same subspecialty microsystem are analysed in each hospital. SETTING:Acute medical admission units in all NHS Acute Trusts in England. PARTICIPANTS:We analysed patient experience data from the English Adult Inpatient Survey which is administered to 850 patients annually in each acute NHS Trusts in England. We selected all 8753 patients who returned the survey and who were emergency medical admissions and stayed in their admission unit for 1-2 nights, so as to isolate the experience delivered during the acute admission process. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:We used multilevel logistic regression to determine the apportioned influence of host organisation and of organisation level factors (size and teaching status), and patient level factors (demographics, presence of long-term conditions and disabilities). We selected 'being treated with respect and dignity' and 'pain control' as primary outcome parameters. Other Picker Domain question scores were analysed as secondary parameters. RESULTS:The proportion of overall variance attributable at organisational level was small; 0.5% (NS) for respect and dignity, 0.4% (NS) for pain control. Long-standing conditions and consequent disabilities were associated with low scores. Other item scores also showed that most influence was from patient level factors. CONCLUSIONS:When a single microsystem, the acute medical admission process, is isolated, variance in experience scores is mainly explainable by patient level factors with limited organisational level influence. This has implications for the use of generic patient experience surveys for comparison between Trusts and should prompt further research to explore if more discriminant surveys can be developed.

译文

目的:先前的研究发现,医院和专科医院对患者经验得分的影响有限,患者水平因素更为重要。这可能是由于组织内各个子部门之间经验交付的异质性。我们旨在确定,如果在每家医院中分析相同的亚专业微系统的分数,组织水平因素是否会产生更大的影响。
地点:英格兰所有NHS急性信托基金中的急性医疗收治单位。
参与者:我们分析了来自英国成人住院调查的患者经验数据,该数据每年在英格兰的每个急性NHS信托基金中对850名患者进行管理。我们选择了所有返回调查的8753名患者,这些患者均为急诊入院,并在其入院病房中停留了1-2个晚上,以隔离急性入院过程中提供的经验。
主要和次要指标:我们使用多级逻辑回归分析确定宿主组织和组织水平因素(规模和教学状况)以及患者水平因素(人口统计学,长期病情和残疾)的分配影响。我们选择“受到尊重和尊严对待”和“疼痛控制”作为主要结局指标。将其他Picker Domain问题分数作为次要参数进行分析。
结果:在组织层面,总体差异的比例很小;尊重和尊严为0.5%(NS),控制疼痛为0.4%(NS)。长期的状况和随之而来的残疾与低分相关。其他项目得分也表明,影响最大的是患者水平因素。
结论:当一个单独的系统(即急性医疗入院流程)被隔离时,经验得分的差异主要可以由受组织水平影响有限的患者水平因素来解释。这对于使用通用的患者经验调查来在Trust之间进行比较具有影响,并且应该促使进行进一步的研究以探索是否可以开发出更多的有区别的调查。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录