This article reports the design and testing of a novel interactive method, abbreviated to ANALYSE (systemAtic aNALYsiS of Electrocardiography) to assist interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiogram. 15 participants interpreted a total of 150 12-lead electrocardiogram recordings randomly using a standard and this novel (ANALYSE) reporting format. The overall aggregated mean score attained using the standard format was 53% (range = 38-82%, standard deviation = 12). Conversely, the overall aggregated mean score attained using ANALYSE format was 75% (range = 55%-93%, standard deviation = 9). A total of 14/15 participants consistently scored higher when interpreting electrocardiograms using the ANALYSE format (range = 10% -45%). A significant difference between the aggregated marks scored using the ANALYSE format and the standard format was calculated (Wilcoxon Z Score = -3.2374 (df = 14), p < 0.01). This study demonstrates the clinical utility of a novel method (ANALYSE) to assist the learning of electrocardiogram interpretation and its association with enhanced diagnostic performance in novices.
-
【A clinical decision support tool to assist with the interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram.].
【一种临床决策支持工具，可帮助解释12导联心电图。】
复制标题
收藏
DOI：10.1177/1460458216683534文章类型：杂志文章
复制DOI
译文
：本文报告了一种新颖的交互式方法的设计和测试，该方法缩写为ANALYZE（心电图的系统分析），以帮助解释12导联心电图。 15名参与者使用标准和这种新颖的（ANALYSE）报告格式随机解释了总共150条12导联心电图记录。使用标准格式获得的总体平均得分为53％（范围= 38-82％，标准差= 12）。相反，使用ANALYZE格式获得的总体总平均得分为75％（范围= 55％-93％，标准差= 9）。使用ANALYZE格式解释心电图时，共有14/15名参与者始终获得较高的评分（范围= 10％-45％）。计算出了使用ANALYZE格式和标准格式评分的汇总标记之间的显着差异（Wilcoxon Z评分= -3.2374（df = 14），p <0.01）。这项研究证明了一种新方法（ANALYSE）的临床实用性，可帮助学习心电图解释并与新手增强的诊断性能相关联。
