BACKGROUND:QT dispersion, maximal interlead difference in QT interval on 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), measures cardiac repolarization abnormalities. Data are conflicting whether QT dispersion predicts adverse outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Our objective is to determine if QT dispersion predicts: (1) short-term clinical outcome in AIS, and (2) stroke location (insular versus noninsular cortex). METHODS:Admission ECGs from 412 consecutive patients with acute stroke symptoms from 2 university-based stroke centers were reviewed. QT dispersion was measured. A neuroradiologist reviewed brain imaging for insular cortex involvement. Favorable clinical outcomes at discharge were modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1, discharge National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score less than 2, and discharge to home. Multiple logistic regressions were performed for each outcome measure and to determine the association between insular infarct and QT dispersion. RESULTS:Of 145 subjects in the final analysis, median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 56-75), male patients were 38%, black patients were 68%, median QT dispersion was 78 milliseconds (IQR 59-98), and median admission NIHSS score was 4 (IQR 2-6). QT dispersion did not predict short-term clinical outcome for mRS score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] .99-1.01, P = .85), NIHSS at discharge (OR = .994, 95% CI .98-1.01, P = .30), or discharge disposition (OR = 1.001, 95% CI .99-1.01, P = .81). Insular cortex involvement did not correlate with QT dispersion magnitude (OR = 1.009, 95% CI .99-1.02, P = .45). CONCLUSIONS:We could not demonstrate that QT dispersion is useful in predicting short-term clinical outcome at discharge in AIS. Further, the magnitude of QT dispersion did not predict insular cortical stroke location.

译文

背景:QT离散度是12导联心电图(ECG)上QT间隔的最大导联间差异,可测量心脏复极化异常。数据是否与QT离散度预测急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的不良结果相矛盾。我们的目标是确定QT离散度是否预测:(1)AIS的短期临床预后,以及(2)脑卒中的位置(孤立与非孤立皮质)。
方法:回顾性分析了来自2个大学卒中中心的412例急性中风症状的连续患者的入院心电图。测量了QT分散度。一位神经放射科医生审查了大脑成像以了解岛状皮层受累情况。出院时的良好临床结局是改良的兰金量表(mRS)评分为0-1,出院的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)得分小于2,并出院回家。对每种结局指标进行了多次逻辑回归分析,并确定了岛梗塞与QT离散度之间的关系。
结果:最终分析的145位受试者中,年龄中位数为65岁(四分位间距[IQR] 56-75),男性患者为38%,黑人患者为68%,QT离散度中位数为78毫秒(IQR 59-98) ,入院NIHSS评分中值为4(IQR 2-6)。 QT离散度不能预测mRS评分的短期临床结果(优势比[OR] = 1.001,95%置信区间[CI] .99-1.01,P = .85),出院时NIHSS(OR = .994,95) %CI 0.98-1.01,P = .30)或放电处置(OR = 1.001,95%CI 0.99-1.01,P = 0.81)。岛状皮层受累与QT离散度无关(OR = 1.009,95%CI 0.99-1.02,P = 0.45)。
结论:我们无法证明QT离散度可用于预测AIS出院时的短期临床结果。此外,QT离散度不能预测皮层皮质中风的位置。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录