Recent debates within the autism advocacy community have raised difficult questions about who can credibly act as a representative of a particular population and what responsibilities that role entails. We attempt to answer these questions by defending a set of evaluative criteria that can be used to assess the legitimacy of advocacy organizations and other nonelectoral representatives. With these criteria in hand, we identify a form of misrepresentation common but not unique to autism advocacy, which we refer to as partial representation. Partial representation occurs when an actor claims to represent a particular group of people but appropriately engages with only a subset of that group. After highlighting symbolic and substantive harms associated with partial representation, we propose several strategies for overcoming it.

译文

自闭症倡导社区最近的辩论提出了一个棘手的问题,即谁可以可信地充当特定人群的代表,以及这一角色需要承担什么责任。我们试图通过捍卫一套可用于评估倡导组织和其他非选举代表的合法性的评估标准来回答这些问题。有了这些标准,我们确定了自闭症倡导中常见但并非唯一的虚假陈述形式,我们将其称为部分陈述。当演员声称代表特定的人群但仅适当地与该人群的一个子集互动时,就会发生部分表示。在强调与部分表示相关的象征性和实质性危害之后,我们提出了几种克服它的策略。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录