Increased arterial stiffness, as estimated from aortic pulse wave velocity (Ao-PWV), and albuminuria are independent predictors for cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), drugs with cardio-renal protective effects, improve Ao-PWV to a greater extent than other equipotent antihypertensive medications remains unclear. After a 4-week washout phase, we compared the effects of valsartan (n=66), an ARB, with that of amlodipine (n=65), a calcium channel blocker on Ao-PWV in 131 T2DM patients with pulse pressure (PP) >or=60 mm Hg and raised albumin excretion rate (AER) in a 24-week randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/d was added to valsartan 160 mg and amlodipine 5 mg/od uptitrated to 10 mg/od after 4 weeks to ensure equivalent BP control. After 24 weeks brachial and central aortic PP had fallen to a similar extent with attained mean (SD) brachial and central PP of 61.6 (13.6) and 47.3 (14.1) mm Hg in the valsartan/HCTZ group and 61.5 (12.2) and 47.3 (9.9) mm Hg in the amlodipine group, respectively. Ao-PWV showed a significantly greater reduction, mean (95% CI), -0.9 m/s (-1.4 to -0.3) for valsartan/HCTZ compared to amlodipine (P=0.002). AER fell significantly only with Val/HCTZ from 30.8(20.4, 46.5) to 18.2(12.5, 26.3) mcg/min, (P=0.01) with between treatment difference in favor of Val/HCTZ of -15.3mcg/min (P<0.001). Changes in AER and Ao-PWV were not correlated. Valsartan/HCTZ improves arterial stiffness and AER to a significantly greater extent than amlodipine despite similar central and brachial BP control. These 2 effects, which appear independent of each other, may explain the specific cardio-renal protective properties of ARBs.

译文

:从主动脉脉搏波速度(Ao-PWV)估计的动脉僵硬度增加和白蛋白尿是2型糖尿病(T2DM)心血管疾病的独立预测因子。尚不清楚血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)(具有心脏-肾脏保护作用的药物)是否比其他等效的降压药物更大程度地改善Ao-PWV。经过4周的冲洗期后,我们比较了131位T2DM脉压患者(PP)的ARB缬沙坦(n = 66)和钙通道阻滞剂氨氯地平(n = 65)对Ao-PWV的影响)>或= 60 mm Hg,并在24周的随机,双盲,平行小组研究中提高了白蛋白排泄率(AER)。 4周后,将25 mg / d的氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)加入缬沙坦160 mg,将氨氯地平5 mg / od升至10 mg / od,以确保等效的BP控制。 24周后,缬沙坦/ HCTZ组的臂和中枢主动脉PP下降幅度相似,达到的平均(SD)臂和中枢PP分别为61.6(13.6)和47.3(14.1)mm Hg,分别为61.5(12.2)和47.3(氨氯地平组分别为9.9)mm Hg。与氨氯地平相比,缬沙坦/ HCTZ的Ao-PWV降低幅度明显更大,均值(95%CI)-0.9 m / s(-1.4至-0.3)(P = 0.002)。仅Val / HCTZ的AER显着下降,从30.8(20.4,46.5)降至18.2(12.5,26.3)mcg / min,(P = 0.01),而Val / HCTZ的治疗差异为-15.3mcg / min(P < 0.001)。 AER和Ao-PWV的变化没有相关性。尽管氨氯地平具有相似的中枢和肱动脉血压控制功能,但缬沙坦/ HCTZ的动脉硬化和AER改善程度明显大于氨氯地平。这两种相互独立出现的效应可能解释了ARB的特定心脏-肾脏保护特性。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录