Buck and Duffy (1980) and Borod et al. (1985) found evidence of deficits in spontaneous expressiveness in right brain-damaged (RBD) patients relative to LBD patients and controls. Using FACS, Mammucari et al. (1988) failed to replicate this result and questioned our methods and findings. This paper replies (a) that Mammucari et al. (1988)'s review of our work is selective and misleading; (b) that there are aspects of their study that can account for their null results, including the insufficient sensitivity of FACS for the measurement of spontaneous expressiveness; and (c) that the results of Mammucari et al. (1988) regarding "aversive eye movements" to a negative film in LBD and control, but not RBD, patients are in fact compatible with our findings. This paper also suggests a general strategy for the objective and comprehensive analysis of spontaneous emotional expressiveness.

译文

Buck和Duffy (1980) 和Borod等人 (1985) 发现右脑受损 (RBD) 患者相对于LBD患者和对照组的自发表达能力不足的证据。使用FACS,mamucari等人 (1988) 未能复制该结果,并质疑我们的方法和发现。本文回答 (a) mamucari等人 (1988) 对我们工作的审查是选择性的和误导性的; (b) 他们的研究有一些方面可以解释他们的无效结果,包括FACS对自发表现力测量的敏感性不足; 并且 (c) mammicuari等人 (1988) 关于LBD和对照 (而不是RBD) 患者对底片的 “厌恶性眼球运动” 的结果实际上与我们的发现兼容。本文还提出了客观综合分析自发情绪表现力的一般策略。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录