This study extends research examining the implications of parent-youth informant discrepancies on youth victimization. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified dyads distinguished by patterns of parent and youth report of victimization. Analyses examined how latent classes were related to adjustment (i.e., anxiety/depression, aggression, and delinquency) concurrently and at follow-up assessment (~2.5 years) in a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse sample. Participants were 485 youths (58.1% male; M age = 12.83 years, SD = 1.60) and their primary caregivers from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. This study compared three classes of youths: (a) Parent > Youth (24.0%), (b) Youth > Parent (21.5%), and (c) Relative Agreement (54.5%). Findings did not support the hypothesis that groups reflecting parental underreporting of youth victimization experiences would show poor adjustment relative to all other classes longitudinally. Surprisingly, youths who self-reported lower levels of victimization than parents reported were at risk for maladjustment over time. This type of discrepant dyad may deserve more careful attention than previously considered in the literature.

译文

本研究扩展了研究父母-青年线人差异对青年受害的影响的研究。潜在阶级分析 (LCA) 确定了以父母和青年受害报告的模式为特征的二元组。在社会经济和种族不同的样本中,分析研究了潜在类别与调整 (即焦虑/抑郁,攻击和犯罪) 同时以及随访评估 (〜2.5年) 之间的关系。参与者是来自芝加哥社区人类发展项目的485名青年 (58.1% 名男性; M年龄 = 12.83岁,SD = 1.60岁) 及其主要照顾者。这项研究比较了三类年轻人 :( a) 父母> 青年 (24.0%),(b) 青年> 父母 (21.5%) 和 (c) 相对同意 (54.5%)。研究结果不支持以下假设: 反映父母对青少年受害经历的报告不足的群体相对于所有其他类别的纵向调整不佳。令人惊讶的是,自我报告的受害程度低于父母报告的年轻人随着时间的推移有适应不良的风险。这种类型的不一致的二元组可能比以前在文献中考虑的要更仔细地注意。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录