To determine whether nurses operationally define child maltreatment in a like manner regardless of their practice specialty, eight practice groups (N = 596) participated in a mail survey. The survey allowed nurses to judge the potential seriousness of child maltreatment incidents. Multivariate statistical analyses revealed significant group differences. Follow-up analyses of variance (ANOVAs) revealed a difference between anesthetists and community health nurses on one factor (parental sexual mores). However, an investigator-developed scale demonstrated the differences would lack substantive value in clinical practice. It was concluded that nursing specialty groups define similarly the seriousness of child abuse and neglect despite varied backgrounds.

译文

为了确定护士是否以类似的方式在操作上定义了虐待儿童的行为,无论其执业专业如何,八个执业小组 (N = 596) 参加了邮件调查。调查允许护士判断虐待儿童事件的潜在严重性。多变量统计分析显示组间存在显著差异。方差 (ANOVAs) 的后续分析显示,麻醉师和社区卫生护士在一个因素 (父母性行为) 上存在差异。然而,研究者制定的量表表明,这些差异在临床实践中缺乏实质性价值。结论是,尽管背景不同,护理专业小组对虐待儿童和忽视儿童的严重性也有类似的定义。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录