Use of an automated electronic sphygmomanometer will allow us to minimize the errors inherent in mercury sphygmomanometry. We conducted this validation according to the 1990 protocol of the British Hypertensive Society. We recruited 87 subjects from the antenatal population of Kandang Kerbau Hospital and took three sequential readings using simultaneously both manual and electronic sphygmomanometry. A total of 261 readings from either method were thus collected and the results analyzed to compare the accuracy of electronically read blood pressure with that assessed manually. We found that 89.9% of the electronically read pressures differed from the manually read pressures by 5 mm Hg or less and 98.9% of the electronic readings differed from manual readings by 10 mm Hg or less; only 0.4% of readings had a difference of more than 15 mm Hg. The accuracy of the device was not affected either by the blood pressure or the arm circumference.