Cell viability and cell proliferation are endpoints that can be used to identify cytotoxic effects. In a study of the cytotoxicity of four biomaterials and drugs, these two criteria were determined by different techniques. There were notable similarities and differences among the different methods used. Cell viability, which was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test, spectrophotometric microtitration (neutral red) and flow cytometry (fluorescein diacetate) gave similar results. However, the neutral red assay was found to be the most sensitive method for determining the cytotoxicity of these biomaterials and drugs. Cell proliferation measurement, by cell counts and quantitative protein estimation (coomassie blue), revealed important variations between the two methods and indicated poor sensitivity for the protein assay. A slight variability in the determination of the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC(50)) for the two drugs was observed for all the techniques.

译文

:细胞活力和细胞增殖是可用于鉴定细胞毒性作用的终点。在对四种生物材料和药物的细胞毒性的研究中,这两种标准是通过不同的技术确定的。使用的不同方法之间存在显着的异同。通过台盼蓝排除试验,分光光度微量滴定(中性红)和流式细胞术(双乙酸荧光素)测定的细胞活力得到了相似的结果。但是,发现中性红分析是确定这些生物材料和药物的细胞毒性的最灵敏方法。通过细胞计数和定量蛋白质估计(考马斯蓝)进行细胞增殖测量,揭示了这两种方法之间的重要差异,并表明蛋白质测定的灵敏度较差。在所有技术中,两种药物的抑制浓度50(IC(50))的测定均存在轻微差异。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录