Despite its centrality to social stress theory, research on the social patterning of stress exposure and coping resources has been sparse and existing research shows conflicting results. We interviewed 396 gay, lesbian and bisexual, and 128 heterosexual people in New York City to examine variability in exposure to stress related to sexual orientation, gender, and race/ethnicity. Multiple linear regressions showed clear support for the social stress hypothesis with regard to race/ethnic minority status, somewhat mixed support with regard to sexual orientation, and no support with regard to gender. We discuss this lack of parsimony in social stress explanations for health disparities.

译文

:尽管它在社会压力理论中处于中心地位,但对压力暴露和应对资源的社会模式的研究却很少,现有研究显示出相互矛盾的结果。我们采访了纽约市396名男同性恋,女同性恋和双性恋者以及128位异性恋者,以研究他们暴露于与性取向,性别和种族/民族有关的压力中的变异性。多元线性回归显示出对种族/族裔少数群体地位的社会压力假说的明确支持,对性取向的支持有些混杂,而对性别的支持则没有。我们在针对健康差异的社会压力解释中讨论了缺乏简约性的问题。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录