INTRODUCTION:Our knowledge of the risk factors involved in the process by which acute pain becomes chronic has improved. Psychological conceptualizations of chronic pain presently include (1) the pain-tension cycle, with special reference to a diathesis-stress model, (2) the operant conditioning model, and (3) the interrelationship between vulnerability to pain attacks on the one hand and body posture, gait and activities of daily living on the other. With reference to these conceptualizations and to psychological procedures for the enhancement of self-management strategies, a low back school was implemented at the worksite as a preventive measure. The target population is characterized by (1) rare but recurrent pain episodes, (2) mild pain that has had little impact on daily activities, and (3) pain contingent on particular activities or situations. LOW BACK SCHOOL: A low back school called "Turn your back on backache" consists of the following elements: (1) analysis of labour conditions and adaptation of the worksite to the person, (2) relaxation and stress management, (3) training of posture, gait, and activities of daily living, and (4) stretching and stengthening of the muscles involved. The programme comprises 12 2-h sessions and is conducted by a physiotherapist according to a manual, after an introduction to self-management procedures including behavioural training for working with groups. For homework, participants are asked to practise the exercises demonstrated. METHOD AND RESULTS:In a preventive context, pain ratings should be of minor importance as an outcome measure. Assuming that future pain is interrelated with present behaviour, changes in behaviour should be the predominant criteria applied to assess the effects of the training. Therefore, as well as assessments of pain episodes and wellbeing, a behavioural observation method based on video-taped behavioural assessment in a standardized situation was used. Course members had to demonstrate a sequence of different activities, including standing and walking, lifting and bending. Each sequence was rated on a four-point scale reflecting the degree to which adequate posture and gait were achieved. The final scale consists of 13 items with an inter-rater-reliability of 0.91 (Cronbach Alpha). The data for 283 persons attending in 31 courses in different industrial and administrative settings was used to evaluate the outcome. A marked decrease in pain episodes and an increase in health status and wellbeing were reported. Behaviour that was learned in the course had been incorporated into everyday activities at the worksite. The behavioural observation method was utilized in a subgroup of this sample who were on the staff of a university hospital. The study used a 2x2 repeated-measures design with the between-subject factor of treatment condition (training vs nontraining) and the within-subject factor of assessment period (pre-treatment=t1, post-treatment=12, 9-month follow-up=t3) allowing for analyses of variance (AN-OVA). Following a matched-pair design, for every person that participated in the training a control person was included in the study to allow control for gender, age, and occupation. This sample consists of 74 pairs and comprises nurses, administration personnel, physicians and physical therapists. Most (80%) are female. So far only 28 pairs have been reassessed at t3. A comparison of the overall scores obtained with the above items before and after treatment demonstrates an extremely significant interaction effect, indicating an increase of adequate behaviours in the treatment group. At the follow-up assessment, the observed effect was maintained. CONCLUSIONS:(1) A back school training for the worksite results in a decreased frequency of back pain episodes and an increase in reported health status and wellbeing. (2) The effects of behavioural training of posture, gait, and activities of daily living in hospital staff are clearly demonstrated by observational methods. (3) Assuming that present posture, gait, and daily activities are interrelated with future pain conditions, an increase in the exercise of adequate behaviours indicates a preventive effect of the back school programme.

译文

简介:我们对急性疼痛变为慢性的过程中涉及的危险因素的了解有所提高。目前,慢性疼痛的心理学概念化包括:(1)疼痛-紧张周期,特别是指素质-压力模型;(2)操作条件调节模型;(3)一方面容易遭受疼痛发作的相互关系,另一方面身体的姿势,步态和日常生活的其他活动有关。参照这些概念化和用于增强自我管理策略的心理程序,在工作场所实施了低腰学校作为预防措施。目标人群的特征是(1)罕见但反复发作的疼痛发作;(2)对日常活动影响不大的轻度疼痛;(3)视特定活动或情况而定的疼痛。腰背学校:称为“腰背痛”的腰背学校包括以下要素:(1)劳动条件分析和工作场所对人的适应性;(2)放松和压力管理;(3)培训姿势,步态和日常生活活动,以及(4)伸展和加强所涉及的肌肉。该程序包括12个2小时的课程,由理疗师根据手册进行,介绍了自我管理程序,包括与小组合作的行为训练。对于家庭作业,要求参与者练习演示的练习。
方法和结果:在预防性背景下,作为结果指标,疼痛等级应具有较小的重要性。假设未来的痛苦与当前的行为有关,那么行为的改变应该是评估培训效果的主要标准。因此,除了对疼痛发作和幸福感进行评估外,还使用了基于录像带行为评估的行为观察方法,该行为评估是在标准化情况下进行的。课程成员必须演示一系列不同的活动,包括站立和行走,举重和弯曲。对每个序列进行四点评估,以反映达到适当姿势和步态的程度。最终量表由13个项目组成,评分者之间的可靠性为0.91(Cronbach Alpha)。共有283人参加了不同工业和行政管理领域的31门课程的数据用于评估结果。据报告,疼痛发作明显减少,健康状况和幸福感增加。在课程中学习到的行为已被纳入工作场所的日常活动中。行为观察方法用于该样本的一个子集,这些子集在大学医院的工作人员中。该研究采用2x2重复测量设计,其中治疗条件的受试者间因素(训练与非训练)和评估期的受试者内因素(治疗前= t1,治疗后= 12,随访9个月- up = t3)允许进行方差分析(AN-OVA)。按照配对设计,对于参加培训的每个人,在研究中都包括一个对照人,以控制性别,年龄和职业。该样本由74对组成,包括护士,管理人员,医师和理疗师。大多数(80%)是女性。到目前为止,在t3时仅重新评估了28对。治疗前后通过上述各项获得的总分的比较显示出非常显着的交互作用,表明治疗组适当行为的增加。在随访评估中,观察到的效果得以维持。
结论:(1)对工作场所进行的返校培训减少了背痛发作的频率,并增加了所报告的健康状况和幸福感。 (2)通过观察方法清楚地证明了对医务人员的姿势,步态和日常生活活动进行行为训练的效果。 (3)假设当前的姿势,步态和日常活动与未来的疼痛状况相关,则增加适当行为的锻炼量可表明返校计划的预防作用。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录