PURPOSE:To compare the diagnostic performance of multirow-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the differentiation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) from other pancreatic cystic masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 53 patients with pathologically proven pancreatic cystic lesions who had undergone MDCT and MRI were included in this study. Two radiologists analyzed the morphologic features of the lesions and graded the lesion conspicuity on each examination. The readers assigned their confidence level regarding the differentiation of IPMN from other lesions and predicting ductal communication of the lesion. The radiologists' diagnostic confidence was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS:The Az values for each observer for predicting ductal communication of the lesion and differentiating IPMN from other lesions were as follows: For MRI they were respectively 0.949 and 0.995 for reader 1, and 0.916 and 0.932 for reader 2. For MDCT they were respectively 0.790 and 0.875 for reader 1, and 0.774 and 0.850 for reader 2. In addition, for differentiating IPMNs from other lesions, MRI was significantly more accurate than MDCT (P < 0.05) for one observer, but for the other observer there was no significant difference between the two examinations (P = 0.059). For predicting ductal communication of the cystic lesions for both observers, MRI was significantly more accurate than MDCT (P < 0.05). The weighted kappa values indicate good agreement (kappa = 0.61) between observers for MDCT, and excellent agreement (kappa = 0.82) for MRI. CONCLUSION:Pancreatic MRI shows better diagnostic performance than MDCT for differentiating IPMNs from other cystic lesions of the pancreas.

译文

目的:比较多排计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在将导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)与其他胰腺囊性肿块相鉴别的诊断性能。
材料与方法:本研究共纳入53例经MDCT和MRI病理证实的胰腺囊性病变的患者。两名放射科医生分析了病变的形态特征,并在每次检查时对病变的明显程度进行了分级。读者为他们分配了关于IPMN与其他病变的区别以及预测病变的导管通透性的置信度。使用接收器工作特性(ROC)分析比较了放射科医生的诊断置信度。
结果:每个观察者用于预测病变的导管通气并将IPMN与其他病变区分开的Az值如下:对于MRI,阅读器1分别为0.949和0.995,阅读器2分别为0.916和0.932。读取器1的读数分别为0.790和0.875,读取器2的读数为0.774和0.850。此外,对于将IPMN与其他病变区分开来,一位观察者的MRI准确性明显高于MDCT(P <0.05),而另一位观察者则无统计学意义。两次检查之间的差异(P = 0.059)。为了预测两位观察者的囊性病变的导管连通性,MRI比MDCT准确得多(P <0.05)。加权kappa值表示MDCT观察者之间的一致性好(kappa = 0.61),而MRI则具有很好的一致性(kappa = 0.82)。
结论:与其他CT胰腺囊性病变相比,胰腺MRI显示出比MDCT更好的诊断性能。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录