OBJECTIVES:To assess the short-term efficacy and toxicity of antimalarials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SEARCH STRATEGY:We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group's trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase up to and including August 2000. We also carried out a handsearch of the reference lists of the trials retrieved from the electronic search. SELECTION CRITERIA:All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing antimalarials against placebo in patients with RA DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data abstraction was carried out independently by two reviewers. The same two reviewers using a validated checklist (Jadad 1996) assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs and CCTs. Rheumatoid arthritis outcome measures were extracted from the publications for the 6-month endpoint. The pooled analysis was performed using standardized mean differences for joint counts, pain and global assessments. Weighted mean differences were used for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Toxicity was evaluated with pooled odds ratios for withdrawals. A chi-square test was used to assess heterogeneity among trials. Fixed effects models were used throughout. MAIN RESULTS:We found four trials, with 300 patients randomized to hydrochloroquine and 292 to placebo. Only trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine could be pooled in the analysis. A statistically significant benefit was observed when hydroxychloroquine was compared to placebo. The standardized mean differences for the various outcome measures ranged from -0.33 to -0.52, and were statistically significant. Statistically significant differences were also observed for ESR. Overall withdrawals and withdrawals due to lack of efficacy were significantly more frequent in the placebo group. No differences were observed in withdrawals due to toxicity. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:Hydroxychloroquine appears to be efficacious for the treatment of RA. Its overall effect appears to be moderate, but its low toxicity profile should be considered when treating patients with RA.

译文

目的:评估抗疟疾药物治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的短期疗效和毒性。
搜索策略:我们搜索了2000年8月及之前的Cochrane肌肉骨骼小组的试验记录,Cochrane对照试验记录,Medline和Embase。
选择标准:比较RA患者抗疟疾药物与安慰剂的所有随机对照试验(RCT)和对照临床试验(CCT)数据收集和分析:数据提取由两名审核员独立进行。同一两位审阅者使用经过验证的清单(Jadad 1996)评估了RCT和CCT的方法学质量。类风湿关节炎的预后指标从出版物中提取,为期6个月。汇总分析使用标准化的均值差异进行关节计数,疼痛和整体评估。加权平均差异用于红细胞沉降率(ESR)。用合并的比值比评估戒断的毒性。卡方检验用于评估试验之间的异质性。始终使用固定效果模型。
主要结果:我们发现了四项试验,其中300例患者随机接受氢氯喹治疗,292例患者接受安慰剂治疗。分析中只能汇总评估羟氯喹的试验。当将羟氯喹与安慰剂进行比较时,观察到统计学上显着的益处。各种结局指标的标准化均值差异范围为-0.33至-0.52,且具有统计学意义。在ESR中也观察到统计学上的显着差异。在安慰剂组中,总体戒断和因缺乏疗效而戒断的频率明显更高。由于毒性,停药后未观察到差异。
审查者的结论:羟氯喹似乎对RA的治疗有效。它的总体作用似乎是中等的,但是在治疗RA患者时应考虑其低毒性。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录