The indications for free flaps have been more or less clarified; however, the course of reconstruction after the failure of a free flap remains undetermined. Is it better to insist on one's initial choice, or should surgeons downgrade their reconstructive goals? To establish a preliminary guideline, this study was designed to retrospectively analyze the outcome of failed free-tissue transfers performed in the authors hospital. Over the past 8 years (1990 through 1997), 3361 head and neck and extremity reconstructions were performed by free-tissue transfers, excluding toe transplantations. Among these reconstructions, 1235 flaps (36.7 percent) were transferred to the head and neck region, and 2126 flaps (63.3 percent) to the extremities. A total of 101 failures (3.0 percent total plus the partial failure rate) were encountered. Forty-two failures occurred in the head and neck region, and 59 in the extremities. Evaluation of the cases revealed that one of three following approaches to handling the failure was taken(1) a second free-tissue transfer; (2) a regional flap transfer; or (3) conservative management with debridement, wound care, and subsequent closure by secondary intention, whether by local flaps or skin grafting. In the head and neck region, 17 second free flaps (40 percent) and 15 regional flaps (36 percent) were transferred to salvage the reconstruction, whereas conservative management was undertaken in the remaining 10 cases (24 percent). In the extremities, 37 failures were treated conservatively (63 percent) in addition to 17 second free flaps (29 percent) and three regional flaps (5 percent) used to salvage the failed reconstruction. Two cases underwent amputation (3 percent). The average time elapsed between the failure and second free-tissue transfer was 12 days (range, 2 to 60 days) in the head and neck region and 18 days (range, 2 to 56 days) in the extremities. In a total of 34 second free-tissue transfers at both localizations, there were only three failures (9 percent). However, in the head and neck region, seven of the regional flaps transferred (47 percent) and four cases that were conservatively treated (40 percent) either failed or developed complications that lengthened the reconstruction period because of additional procedures. Six other free-tissue transfers had to be performed to manage these complicated cases. Conservative management was quite successful in the extremities; most patients' wounds healed, although more than one skin-graft procedure was required in 10 patients (27 percent). In conclusion, a second free-tissue transfer is, in general, a relatively more reliable and more effective procedure for the treatment of flap failure in the head and neck region, as well as failed vascularized bone flaps in the reconstruction of the extremities. Conservative treatment may be a simple and valid alternative to second (free) flaps for soft-tissue coverage in extremities with partial and even total losses.

译文

游离皮瓣的迹象已或多或少得到澄清; 但是,游离皮瓣失败后的重建过程仍未确定。坚持自己的最初选择是更好的选择,还是外科医生应该降低他们的重建目标?为了建立初步指南,本研究旨在回顾性分析在作者医院进行的游离组织转移失败的结果。在过去的8年中 (1990 1997年),3361头,颈部和四肢重建是通过自由组织转移进行的,不包括脚趾移植。在这些重建中,1235皮瓣 (36.7%) 转移到头部和颈部区域,2126皮瓣 (63.3%) 转移到四肢。总共遇到101个故障 (3.0% 个故障总数加上部分故障率)。头部和颈部发生42次故障,四肢发生59次。对病例的评估显示,采取以下三种处理失败的方法之一 (1) 第二次游离组织转移; (2) 局部皮瓣转移; 或 (3) 通过清创术,伤口护理和随后通过次要意图关闭的保守治疗,无论是通过局部皮瓣还是植皮。在头颈部区域,转移了17个第二游离皮瓣 (40%) 和15个区域皮瓣 (36%) 以挽救重建,而在其余10例病例中进行了保守治疗 (24%)。在四肢中,除了17个第二游离皮瓣 (29%) 和三个用于挽救失败重建的区域皮瓣 (5%) 之外,还保守地处理了37个失败 (63%)。2例行截肢术 (3%)。从失败到第二次游离组织转移之间的平均时间在头颈部区域为12天 (范围为2至60天),在四肢为18天 (范围为2至56天)。在两个位置总共34秒的自由组织转移中,只有三个失败 (9%)。然而,在头颈部区域,转移的区域皮瓣中有7例 (47% 例) 和保守治疗的4例 (40% 例) 失败或出现并发症,由于其他手术而延长了重建时间。为了处理这些复杂的情况,必须执行其他六个自由组织转移。保守治疗在四肢非常成功; 尽管10例患者 (27% 例) 需要进行多次皮肤移植手术,但大多数患者的伤口均已愈合。总之,第二次游离组织转移通常是一种相对更可靠,更有效的方法,用于治疗头颈部区域的皮瓣衰竭以及在重建四肢时血管化的骨皮瓣失败。保守治疗可能是第二 (自由) 皮瓣的一种简单有效的替代方法,可用于四肢软组织覆盖,部分甚至全部损失。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录