Assessment of wound healing is a complex task, especially when the lesion is associated to significant (full thickness) loss of the skin. The clinical observation, essentially subjective and highly dependent on the observer's experience, creates difficulties in the comparison of results. Scoring scales were introduced in the clinical practice to create comparable semi-quantitative data and promote better management of resources, but its usefulness in a clinical perspective is still limited. New non-invasive biometric methodologies, although infrequently used, have opened new possibilities. While complementing the clinical observation and contributing to therapeutic decisions and prognosis, they may also help to look further into the pathophysiological mechanisms of scarring drugs rehabilitation. Following previous work in this arena, the authors review, the state-of-the-art of cutaneous wound healing clinical and biometric follow up, proposing a diagnosis correlation for the most relevant descriptors found in both strategies in order to fully characterise the different stages of the healing process.

译文

评估伤口愈合是一项复杂的任务,尤其是当病变与皮肤的显着 (全层) 损失相关时。临床观察本质上是主观的,并且高度依赖于观察者的经验,因此在比较结果方面造成了困难。在临床实践中引入了评分量表,以创建可比较的半定量数据并促进更好的资源管理,但其在临床方面的实用性仍然有限。新的非侵入性生物识别方法虽然很少使用,但开辟了新的可能性。在补充临床观察并有助于治疗决策和预后的同时,它们也可能有助于进一步研究疤痕药物康复的病理生理机制。在这个领域的先前工作之后,作者回顾了皮肤伤口愈合的最新技术,临床和生物特征随访,提出了两种策略中最相关的描述符的诊断相关性,以便充分表征不同的特征愈合过程的阶段。

+1
+2
100研值 100研值 ¥99课程
检索文献一次
下载文献一次

去下载>

成功解锁2个技能,为你点赞

《SCI写作十大必备语法》
解决你的SCI语法难题!

技能熟练度+1

视频课《玩转文献检索》
让你成为检索达人!

恭喜完成新手挑战

手机微信扫一扫,添加好友领取

免费领《Endnote文献管理工具+教程》

微信扫码, 免费领取

手机登录

获取验证码
登录